Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Exit from comment view mode. Click to hide this space
3

The Driverless City

CAMBRIDGE – At the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas last week, the roulette wheel of innovation landed on something rather old-fashioned and unexpected: the automobile. In recent decades, cars have been undergoing a gradual transformation from the kinds of mechanical systems Henry Ford might have imagined into computers on wheels. And that transformation is bringing with it a new wave of digital advances – above all, autonomous driving.

The first autonomous (or self-driving) cars date back to the late twentieth century. But recent increases in sophistication and reductions in cost – reflected, for example, in cheap LIDAR systems, which can “see” a street in 3D in a way similar to that of the human eye – are now bringing driverless cars closer to the market.

As we saw last week, several manufacturers are working toward integrating such systems into their fleets, and expect to start selling premium cars with different degrees of autonomy as early as 2016. According to a just-released IHS report, “sometime after 2050” virtually all vehicles on the road might be self-driving.

But what is the drive behind self-driving cars? Are there meaningful benefits beyond the convenience of keeping your hands off the steering wheel and thus being able to read a book, take a nap, or guiltlessly text?

At the CES, journalists were busy snapping pictures of driverless vehicles zooming through the streets of Vegas. But, had they turned their cameras around, they might have captured something far more interesting: the stage upon which the drama of self-driving will take place – the street itself.

Self-driving vehicles promise to have a dramatic impact on urban life, because they will blur the distinction between private and public modes of transportation. “Your” car could give you a lift to work in the morning and then, rather than sitting idle in a parking lot, give a lift to someone else in your family – or, for that matter, to anyone else in your neighborhood, social-media community, or city.

A recent paper by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s SMART Future Mobility team shows that the mobility demand of a city like Singapore – potentially host to the world’s first publicly-accessible fleet of self-driving cars – could be met with 30% of its existing vehicles. Furthermore, other researchers in the same group suggest that this number could be cut by another 40% if passengers traveling similar routes at the same time were willing to share a vehicle – an estimate supported by an analysis of New York City Taxis shareability networks. This implies a city in which everyone can travel on demand with just one-fifth of the number of cars in use today.

Such reductions in car numbers would dramatically lower the cost of our mobility infrastructure and the embodied energy associated with building and maintaining it. Fewer cars may also mean shorter travel times, less congestion, and a smaller environmental impact.

The deployment of more intelligent transportation systems promises to deliver similar benefits. Real-time data planning and smart routing are already a reality. Tomorrow’s autonomous vehicles will prompt another wave of innovation, from optimization of road capacity to intersection management. Imagine a world without traffic lights, where vehicular flows “magically” pass through one another and avoid collision.

But, while the world’s mobility challenges will increasingly be met with silicon rather than asphalt, encouraging widespread adoption requires guaranteeing that our streets are as safe – or safer – than they are today. That means that various redundancies must be introduced to ensure that if one component fails, another seamlessly takes over.

Traffic accidents, though rarer, would still be a possibility; in fact, they might be one of the main impediments to implementation of autonomous systems, demanding a restructuring of insurance and liability that could sustain armies of lawyers for years to come.

Finally, there is the fresh issue of digital security. We are all familiar with viruses crashing our computers. But what if the same virus crashes our cars?

All of these issues are urgent, but none of them is insurmountable. They will be resolved in the coming years as autonomy redefines mobility and sparks the next generation of innovations in the field. At that point, the smart money might favor something even more old-fashioned than cars: the city itself.

Read more from the "The Innovation Revolution"

Exit from comment view mode. Click to hide this space
Hide Comments Hide Comments Read Comments (3)

Please login or register to post a comment

  1. CommentedEuro Blur

    The limiting factor on the length of a daily commute by car is the fact that time spent behind the wheel is unproductive and stressful. The cost of driving appears to be less of an issue and is likely to be offset by the difference in real estate prices between urban centers and suburban areas. Assuming that self-driving cars would enable passengers to be productive, relax or even catch up on sleep while travelling to their destination, longer commutes could become more acceptable and more urban sprawl could be the result. I believe that this outcome is at least as likely as the one described by the authors.

  2. CommentedNathan Coppedge

    Driverless cars are sort of on the opposite end of the conceptual spectrum from intermediate zoning. However, it is perceivable that hospitals could integrate with urban environments more easily if everything were roboticized. The difference between consumer and scientific instruments is also more significantly blurred. Perhaps this is a necessary step towards consumer astro-citizenship. Even so, I suspect when it comes to these kinds of issues, most consumers' minds are more attuned to gamification concerns. How do I turn a hospital or a car into an entertainment system? How do I get more meaningful activity / interfacing / QOL from any given apparatus, both as a coherent network that integrates functions (and don't feel stupid about this one, believe me, that's the only downside), and ways of finding unique experiences within 'the grid': ways of experiencing light and shadow the way one wants, seeing what one wants to see, and feeling what one wants to feel.

    To some extent, old consumer mentalities are over-rated. But the old paradigms still survive as images and factors of information. If society doesn't get technical with the exponential aspects of social media and game design, well nigh culture design, or socio-economic-political design, we may very well miss the next big wave.

    So far as I'm concerned, it's all about big ideas, and providing the right trivial rewards to any given person. Some of this is just about efficient infrastructure or retrofitting platforms (applications for applications, and available reality-oriented tools).

  3. CommentedKir Komrik

    Thanks for the great article,

    I had not thought about how this could be used to reduce vehicle numbers, but it certainly could. And the "time-share" cost of a vehicle would make them much cheaper.

    I think the perhaps unforeseen advantage is safety. Automobiles are, statistically speaking, extremely deadly. Under a fully automated, well-developed system, accidents would drop off the statistics charts almost completely. Travel times would be shorter and more energy efficient. And it would allow occupants to engage in productive activity inside the vehicle in transit. This is a great idea whose time is near, imo.

    - kk

Featured