A homeless man holds a sign as he panhandles for spare change Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Long Reads

Who Cares About Big Tech’s Displaced Workers?

The story of the US economy over the past 40 years has been one of rapid technological change, growing corporate monopoly power, and deepening despair for a rising share of workers. There will be no happy ending unless the US radically changes its approach to managing the impact of innovation.

STANFORD – Have we entered a new Gilded Age, in which tech monopolies wield enormous political and economic power in the same way that Standard Oil did at the end of the nineteenth century? The scale of wealth being produced for a select few, along with the mounting despair of workers who are left behind by technology-driven economic change, certainly suggests that growing monopoly power is strangling parts of our economy. But the monopolies of the Gilded Age were very different corporate creatures from the technology driven monopolies that have arisen in recent decades.

The Gilded Age monopolies were created via collusion, intimidation and bribery by corporate bosses. They were eventually rendered illegal by antitrust laws. Today’s monopolies, however, are legal and were created by true innovators who received various forms of legal protection as their firms rose to dominance. John D Rockefeller, J. P. Morgan, Andrew Carnegie or Cornelius Vanderbilt were corporate bosses, not innovators like Jeff Bezos, Sergey Brin, Steve Jobs and Mark Zuckerberg. So, in contrast to the antitrust policy of the past, what is needed today is an approach to monopoly power that relies on policy which is both subtle and complex. And this requires that we reconsider many of our prior biases and preconceptions about what a “free market” truly means, and about the role of government in that market.

Whereas the US government, in 1911, broke up Standard Oil into 34 companies for its violations of the 1890 Sherman Antitrust Act, an effective policy toward contemporary monopolies will require legal adaptation to the new reality: a new approach to taxation, regulation, patent laws and labor markets. Here, I focus on the labor market, and the need to establish a principle of “required compensation” for workers whose lives have been damaged by today’s new monopoly power. Such compensation should – indeed, must – be the basis of a strategy to correct the negative consequences of today’s misguided policies, which have allowed the increasing concentration of enormous wealth, accompanied by the despair of many millions of ordinary American workers who see the future foreclosed to them.

To continue reading, please subscribe to On Point.

To read this article, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free On Point articles as well as two articles from our archive. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.

required

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in

http://prosyn.org/WQoDwlR;

Handpicked to read next

  1. man looking at skyline chinese city Yinjia Pan/Getty Images

    The Evolution of Globalization

    Since the turn of the century, globalization has delivered in spades for many emerging and developing economies, but it has alienated many in the developed world. Did an agenda that has promoted economic convergence sow the seeds of its own destruction?

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.