Skip to main content

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated Cookie policy, Privacy policy and Terms & Conditions

benami154_Yousef MasoudSOPA ImagesLightRocket via Getty Images_palestine Yousef Masoud/SOPA IMAGES/LightRocket via Getty Images

PS Say More

English

Daoud Kuttab
Says More…

This week, Project Syndicate catches up with Daoud Kuttab, an award-winning Palestinian journalist and Deputy Chair of the International Press Institute.

Project Syndicate: After US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo declared that Israeli settlements in the West Bank do not violate international law, you argued that the only way to avert a renewed Israeli settlement-building frenzy would be for the European Union to recognize Palestine as an independent, occupied state, and “engage with it accordingly.” What type of engagement is needed to ensure that this move – unlike, say, United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334, which in 2016 reaffirmed the settlements’ illegality – changes the situation on the ground?

Daoud Kuttab: Getting Israel to pay attention will require action, not more rhetoric. Recognizing Palestine as an independent state along the pre-1967 borders is the difference between the two.

The EU has long claimed to support a two-state solution along the pre-1967 borders. In 2014, the European Parliament voted overwhelmingly to recognize Palestinian statehood, something that some national parliaments (such as in France, Ireland, Luxemburg, and Sweden) have also done. But the EU motion was qualified, stating that the body supported “in principle” recognition of Palestinian statehood and the two-state solution, which “should go hand in hand with the development of peace talks.”

With this watered-down motion, the EU merely paid lip service to the two-state solution, while doing nothing to galvanize action. Meanwhile, only one of the two states is thriving; worse, it is occupying the other, thereby denying its people the right of self-determination.

Only by unequivocally recognizing Palestine as an independent state can Europe hope to change the reality on the ground. After all, in that context, one could not pretend that Israeli efforts to annex parts of the West Bank amounted to anything less than an illegal incursion into the territory of a neighboring state.

To be sure, recognition is not an end in itself; it is the bare minimum. The EU would also have to treat the state of Palestine as it would with any other newly independent country eager to engage with the world. That means upgrading diplomatic relations to reflect Palestine’s new status and deepening economic ties – something that Palestine needs, but, contrary to what US President Donald Trump seems to assume, not at the expense of human rights and national sovereignty.

As Luxembourg Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn wrote to the EU foreign-policy chief and EU foreign ministers, the only way to save the two-state solution is to create “a more equitable situation.” That means recognizing – and treating – Palestine as an independent state. With Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu threatening to annex large parts of the West Bank, the EU must not wait.

PS: Are there other measures that the EU – or individual member states – could take to curb Israeli settlement-building? How much potential do you see in agreements like those reached last month between the Palestinian government and the French Development Agency to support infrastructure and agricultural development in Palestinian communities in the West Bank?

DK: In lieu of unequivocal EU-wide recognition of Palestine, individual countries can reduce or even suspend aid to Israel. The EU as a whole can eliminate any favorability status that Israel enjoys, until the country engages credibly with Palestinians on the two-state solution.

Plans like that by the French Development Agency to support Palestinian infrastructure has a lot of potential, both symbolic and practical, and could be replicated and adapted by other European actors. But any such initiative’s impact will depend on implementation – and not just from a technical perspective. Will Palestinians in the Israel-controlled “Area C” benefit from this support? If Israel resists the use of French development finance in this area, will France push back, or will it simply allow Israel to get away with yet further violations of Palestinians’ rights?

PS: Two successive elections offering Israelis a choice, in your words, between “war and more war” have failed to produce a government, and the country remains deeply divided over Netanyahu, who has been indicted on corruption charges. How does this deadlock affect Palestine? Would a more centrist Israeli government adopt different stances on key questions, such as settlements and the right of return for Palestinian refugees?

DK: The deadlock itself has done little to change the situation for Palestinians, because it has kept Netanyahu in power, albeit as the head of a caretaker government. As a result, settlement activities have continued, and the threat of annexation remains significant.

If the next election produces a more centrist government headed by General Benny Gantz, an immediate breakthrough remains unlikely. But it could bring the beginning of a new peace process, which could ultimately lead to progress. I don’t have any illusions that Gantz will be able to snap his fingers and achieve agreement on a two-state solution. But it is possible that, with Israel’s far-right forces sidelined after a decade in power, the long march back to a sane Israeli policy toward the Palestinians could begin.

We hope you're enjoying Project Syndicate.

To continue reading, subscribe now.

Subscribe

Get unlimited access to PS premium content, including in-depth commentaries, book reviews, exclusive interviews, On Point, the Big Picture, the PS Archive, and our annual year-ahead magazine.

Kuttab recommends

We ask all our Say More contributors to tell our readers about a few books that have impressed them recently. Here are Kuttab's picks:

  • One Country: A Bold Proposal to End the Israeli-Palestinian Impasse

    One Country: A Bold Proposal to End the Israeli-Palestinian Impasse

    This book, written by a Palestinian-American journalist, challenges the conventional wisdom that the only solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the formation of two separate states. While I advocate a two-state solution, I believe that Abunimah’s analysis is worth reading.

  • Voices of Jordan

    Voices of Jordan

    This book offers a picture of life in Jordan by exploring the experiences of ordinary people, including a Syrian refugee, a jihadist, and a female parliamentarian.

  • Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind

    Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind

    With a multi-disciplinary approach, Harari traces the evolution of humanity – with a focus on key processes, from the advent of agriculture to the rise of the nation-state – in order to try to explain why we are the way we are.

From the PS Archive

From 2017
Kuttab reacted to the US decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, in defiance of overwhelming global opposition. Read the commentary.

From 2016
Just after Trump was elected, Kuttab poured cold water on hopes that America's new president would deal fairly with the Middle East. Read the commentary.

Around the web

Kuttab recently interviewed Swedish Foreign Minister Margot Wallstrom about the Palestinian refugee challenge, recognizing Palestine as an independent state, and more. Watch their discussion.

Nearly 15 years ago, Kuttab wrote a New York Times opinion article describing the evacuation of Israeli civilians from the Gaza Strip from a Palestinian perspective. Read the commentary.

https://prosyn.org/fxJwFGt;