Getty Images

The Year Ahead 2018

重振公共财富创造

伦敦—站在新年的门口,一个在经济学家之间进行了数十年之久的旧争论再次热门起来:紧缩是帮助还是伤害了经济增长?广泛而言,争论者可以分为两个阵营:保守派要求限制公共支出,亦即小国家;进步派则支持加大公共品投资和服务投资力度,如基础设施、教育和医疗等。

当然,现实要比简单区分更加复杂,即便是正统机构,如国际货币基金组织(IMF),也同意紧缩可能起到适得其反的效果。凯恩斯在20世纪30年代时指出,如果政府在衰退期间削减支出,那么短期的衰退有可能演变为全方位萧条。2008年金融危机后欧洲的紧缩时期正是发生了这种情况。

但进步派日程不可能仅仅局限于公共支出。凯恩斯也要求决策者要有大视角。“对政府来说,一个要点是不要做个人已经在做的事情,”他在1926年的著作《自由放任的终结》(The End of Laissez Faire)中指出,“而是要做现在没人在做的事情。”换句话说,政府应该战略性地思考投资如何帮助决定公民的长期前景。

To continue reading, please subscribe to On Point.

To access On Point, log in or register now now and read two On Point articles for free. For unlimited access to the unrivaled analysis of On Point, subscribe now.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/x0x81Qz/zh;
  1. Donald Trump delivers his address to a joint session of Congress  Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call/Getty Images

    Trump’s Abominable Snow Job

    • In the 2016 US presidential election, Donald Trump presented himself as a populist who would protect America’s “forgotten” workers from the disruptions of trade and immigration and the nefarious designs of unnamed elites.

    • But, a year after assuming office, it has become abundantly clear that “America first” means workers come last.
  2. Project Syndicate

    PS Commentators’ Best Reads in 2017

    • For the first time, Project Syndicate has asked its contributors what they’ve been reading, and why. 

    • Their choices may surprise, but surely will not disappoint, readers seeking the most important books on history, politics, economics, as well as more than one novel.