Objectifs pour le développement et condition de la femme

NEW YORK – À l’approche de l’échéance 2015 des Objectifs du Millénaire pour le développement (OMD), les dirigeants mondiaux vont devoir faire un choix : reporter à nouveau la démarche d’une ou deux décennies, ou tenir pour responsables ceux qui ont échoué à honorer leurs engagements. S’agissant de la condition de la femme, ce choix ne fait aucun doute.

Cette situation n’a rien d’inédit. En 1978, lors de la Conférence internationale d’Alma-Ata sur les soins de santé primaires, quelque 134 pays avaient ratifié une déclaration censée promouvoir une santé de qualité pour tous d’ici l’an 2000. Seize ans plus tard au Caire, en 1994, 179 gouvernements avaient reconnu comme fondamentaux les droits liés à la sexualité et à la procréation, et adopté plusieurs résolutions destinées à garantir l’accès universel à tout un ensemble de services de santé en matière de procréation, parmi lesquels le planning familial.

Autant d’échéances plus ou moins respectées, jusqu’à ce qu’en septembre 2000, lors de la 55e Assemblée générale de l’ONU, les dirigeants de 189 nations s’entendent sur la fixation des OMD. Plusieurs autres résolutions et engagement ont par ailleurs été adoptés par les responsables mondiaux, antérieurement et postérieurement à la déclaration des OMD.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now