Ganar la paz

El futuro de Afganistán pende de los esfuerzos de su débil gobierno nacional por conservar apoyo y legitimidad de cara a una creciente insurgencia, los señores de la guerra, el comercio de heroína y una población desilusionada. A lo largo de un arco que se extiende desde este país al África oriental, la violencia hoy arrecia en Irak, el Líbano, Somalia y más allá, en la región de Darfur de Sudán.

Los políticos, generales e incluso diplomáticos hablan por doquier de maniobras y estrategias militares, pero en todos esos lugares se necesita algo completamente diferente. La estabilidad llegará sólo cuando existan oportunidades económicas, cuando una palpitante generación de jóvenes pueda encontrar empleo y sustentar una familia, en lugar de tentar fortuna en la violencia.

Una y otra vemos que un ejército extranjero, ya se trate de la OTAN en Afganistán, el de Estados Unidos en Irak, el israelí en la Palestina ocupada o el de Etiopía en Somalia, puede ganar una batalla o hasta una guerra, pero nunca la paz. La paz tiene que ver con la dignidad y la esperanza en el futuro. La ocupación militar destroza la dignidad y la pobreza absoluta y el desastre económico destrozan la esperanza. Sólo es posible lograr la paz con la retirada de las tropas y la llegada de empleos, granjas y fábricas productivas, turismo, atención de salud y escuelas. Sin estos elementos, la ocupación y la victoria militar rápidamente se convierten en cenizas.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/xlmxY4J/es;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now