Whose Champions, Anyway?

The links between states and companies have grabbed headlines, most recently in Russia, where President Vladimir Putin seems obsessed with creating “national champions” in the energy and aerospace sectors. Such efforts seem but a part of a surge of protectionism in European political debate about business, especially when it comes to cross-border acquisitions.

Across Europe, governments position themselves to be seen as defending “national” players from “foreign” competitors. “Economic patriotism,” the slogan coined by France’s Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin following PepsiCo’s rumored attempt in July 2005 to takeover Danone, perhaps best encapsulates the political imperative. Although de Villepin’s speeches are more flamboyant than those of most political leaders, the underlying sentiment extends far beyond France.

The same impulse appears to be at work behind Italy’s policy on Autostrade, Spain’s on Endesa, Poland’s on its banking sector, the former Swedish Prime Minister’s on Volvo, German unease about “locust”-like funds on Deutsche Börse, or the United Kingdom’s ever louder defense of the London Stock Exchange’s independence from the United States.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To access our archive, please log in or register now and read two articles from our archive every month for free. For unlimited access to our archive, as well as to the unrivaled analysis of PS On Point, subscribe now.

required

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in

http://prosyn.org/gRrblay;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.