La paradoja de Boston

MOSCÚ – ¿Quién tiene la culpa de que estallaran bombas en la maratón de Boston? ¿Rusia es responsable de intentar durante 250 años incorporar a las naciones musulmanas del norte del Cáucaso, como los chechenos y los daguestaníes, primero al Imperio Ortodoxo Cristiano de los zares, luego a la Unión Soviética y ahora al estado ruso de Vladimir Putin que todo lo controla? ¿O es el Islam radical la única explicación que necesitamos, tanto en Rusia como en Occidente?

El ataque de Tamerlan y Dzhokhar Tsarnaev invariablemente ha dado lugar a comparaciones con los terroristas de origen saudita que atacaron a Estados Unidos el 11 de septiembre de 2001 o con el inmigrante paquistaní Faisal Shahzad, que intentó hacer estallar un coche bomba en Times Square en 2010. Otros han sugerido que Tamerlan, un checheno étnico de 26 años, puede haber presenciado la guerra rusa/chechena de 1999, o los esfuerzos brutales de Rusia por apaciguar la lucha insurgente en el norte del Cáucaso. Abrumados por la crueldad del Ejército Rojo, se dice que él y su hermano adolescente eligieron diseminar la violencia en suelo norteamericano.

El problema con esta explicación, por supuesto, es que los hermanos Tsarnaev eran de Kirguistán. Nunca vivieron en Chechenia y sólo pasaron brevemente por Daguestán a comienzos de los años 2000. Sus vínculos con la región son los de la diáspora. El presidente checheno, Ramzan Kadyrov, un ex rebelde, se apresuró a decir que los hermanos no tenían nada que ver con su república.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/vzUA7k6/es;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now