Whenever I arrive in Moscow, I am impressed by its new shops and buildings. But another key aspect of the Yeltsin era - its rollicking debates - has fallen silent. Part of the explanation for this is increased official control, part is declining public interest, and part is that Russia's problems nowadays simply seem less urgent.
After the government seized influence over the independent television networks, NTV and TV6, Russia's media became vastly duller. The latest fad is for officials to sue newspapers for libel, demanding over $1 million. Russian journalists are often corrupt, and tens of thousands of dollars are paid for a single defaming TV program or newspaper article. Yet, systematic silencing of Russia's media is unnecessary.
The reason for this is simple: the lives of ordinary people are improving, so they support Putin willingly. Their main concern is the falling growth rate - from 9% in 2000 to 3.5-4% this year - yet output statistics keep rising. Indeed, the only big macroeconomic debate concerns exchange rate policy, where Presidential advisor Andrei Illarionov argues that Russia's real exchange rate is too high - indeed, is now as high as in 1998.
To continue reading, register now.
Subscribe now for unlimited access to everything PS has to offer.
Subscribe
As a registered user, you can enjoy more PS content every month – for free.
Register
Already have an account?
Log in
Whenever I arrive in Moscow, I am impressed by its new shops and buildings. But another key aspect of the Yeltsin era - its rollicking debates - has fallen silent. Part of the explanation for this is increased official control, part is declining public interest, and part is that Russia's problems nowadays simply seem less urgent.
After the government seized influence over the independent television networks, NTV and TV6, Russia's media became vastly duller. The latest fad is for officials to sue newspapers for libel, demanding over $1 million. Russian journalists are often corrupt, and tens of thousands of dollars are paid for a single defaming TV program or newspaper article. Yet, systematic silencing of Russia's media is unnecessary.
The reason for this is simple: the lives of ordinary people are improving, so they support Putin willingly. Their main concern is the falling growth rate - from 9% in 2000 to 3.5-4% this year - yet output statistics keep rising. Indeed, the only big macroeconomic debate concerns exchange rate policy, where Presidential advisor Andrei Illarionov argues that Russia's real exchange rate is too high - indeed, is now as high as in 1998.
To continue reading, register now.
Subscribe now for unlimited access to everything PS has to offer.
Subscribe
As a registered user, you can enjoy more PS content every month – for free.
Register
Already have an account? Log in