¿Qué es lo positivo del plan fiscal de los Estados Unidos?

CAMBRIDGE – El plan fiscal acordado por el Presidente Barack Obama y sus oponentes republicanos en el Congreso de los Estados Unidos representa la combinación correcta de una política tributaria apropiada a corto plazo y un primer paso con vistas a la prudencia fiscal a más largo plazo. La característica principal del acuerdo es la de prolongar los tipos del impuesto sobre la renta vigentes en 2010 durante dos años más, sin un compromiso sobre lo que se hará con ellos más adelante.

Sin dicho acuerdo sobre los impuestos, los tipos impositivos habrían vuelto a ser en 2011 los del nivel superior anterior a las reducciones fiscales de Bush en 2001, lo que significaría impuestos más altos para todos los contribuyentes, al aumentar las cuotas líquidas en 2011 y 2012 en unos 450.000 millones de dólares (el 1,5 por ciento del PIB).

Como el PIB de los Estados Unidos ha estado creciendo últimamente a una tasa anual de sólo dos por ciento –y la de las ventas finales ha sido sólo de un uno por ciento, aproximadamente–, dicho aumento de los impuestos probablemente habría abocado la economía de los EE.UU. a una nueva recesión. Aunque se califica la nueva legislación tributaria de estímulo fiscal, es más exacto decir que evita una gran contracción fiscal inmediata.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now