Quelle remise à zéro ?

MOSCOU – L’apparition à la tête du Kremlin d'un dirigeant sans lien avec le KGB, le président Dmitri Medvedev, sur fond de crise économique, a laissé penser que lors de sa venue à Moscou, le président des Etats-Unis Barack Obama verrait un pays au bord du dégel politique, une nouvelle perestroïka . Mais remettre à zéro les relations russo-américaines sera plus difficile que ce qu’Obama et son équipe avaient escompté.

Les dirigeants russes (ou soviétiques) optent pour la perestroïka ou le dégel seulement lorsque de terribles conditions menaçant la survie du régime les y poussent. Un climat de terreur mortelle, de suspicion mutuelle et de haine au sein de l’élite communiste fut le catalyseur du dégel post-stalinien de Nikita Khrouchtchev. Le catalyseur de la perestroïka de Mikhaïl Gorbatchev dans les années 1980 fut la paralysie croissante de l’économie de l’URSS.

Les deux hommes visaient avant tout à s’accrocher au pouvoir. Changer le système et relâcher leur emprise sur le pouvoir était un risque qui pouvait saper leur autorité. Mais, l'inertie était, semble-t-il, encore plus risquée. En fin de compte, opter pour le changement a forcé les deux hommes à quitter leur poste à une époque prématurée et contre leur volonté.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now