Recovering Humanitarian Law
Recent attacks on refugee camps and hospitals, not to mention the withholding of humanitarian aid, demonstrate an absolute disdain for internationally accepted norms of conduct. The measure of human progress is whether such behavior is regarded – by anyone – as normal or inevitable.
MADRID – Even amid the chaos and catastrophes caused by war, there are internationally recognized limits on combatants’ behavior. And yet recent deliberate attacks on refugee camps and hospitals, in Syria and elsewhere, demonstrate an absolute disdain for basic humanitarian norms. Indeed, such behavior – which also includes obstruction of humanitarian aid and attacks on medical and humanitarian personnel – has become all too common.
Today, the United Nations estimates that approximately 125 million people are in need of humanitarian aid – a number that increases every year. More than 60 million people – half of them children – are currently displaced as a result of violence or conflict. In the past decade alone, the cost of humanitarian aid has increased 600%, making it practically unsustainable.
With this concern in mind, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has convened a World Humanitarian Summit, the first in the UN’s 60-year history. The meetings and talks taking place in Istanbul on May 23-24 will address the five core items comprising the Agenda for Humanity: preventing and ending conflicts; defending humanitarian norms; reducing displacement, protecting women and girls, and providing education in conflict zones; reinforcing national and local capacities to provide aid; and increasing investment in human development.
We hope you're enjoying Project Syndicate.
To continue reading, subscribe now.
Get unlimited access to PS premium content, including in-depth commentaries, book reviews, exclusive interviews, On Point, the Big Picture, the PS Archive, and our annual year-ahead magazine.
Already have an account or want to create one? Log in