La lucha de Ucrania por el imperio de la ley

Un año después de nuestra Revolución Naranja, muchos ucranianos sienten que sus ideales han sido traicionados. La convicción de que es posible lograr un gobierno que rinda cuentas al pueblo y un mercado transparente que esté libre de especuladores que se aprovechan de información interna ya no guía la política del gobierno. En lugar de ello, los ideales por los que luchamos parecen eslóganes que invocan quienes desean proteger sus intereses creados.

Los cínicos explican esto diciendo que nuestros ideales “naranjas” nunca fueron otra cosa que las racionalizaciones de un grupo de oligarcas que luchaba por sacar a otro del poder. Dicen que, una vez que llegaron a dominar la situación, el celo de quienes prometieron reformas se convirtió en celo por conservar sus riquezas personales y las de sus amistades.

¿Cómo llegó Ucrania a este estado de cinismo? Hace un año, todos quienes nos manifestábamos en las calles de Kiev sabíamos contra qué luchábamos: un gobierno corrupto que intentó manejar a su antojo la vida, el trabajo y la propiedad estatal. A pesar de que existían derechos legales formales, no se podía confiar en ninguna corte para su aplicación cuando nuestros gobernantes veían que sus intereses estaban en peligro.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now