Access every new PS commentary, our entire On Point suite of subscriber-exclusive content – including Longer Reads, Insider Interviews, Big Picture/Big Question, and Say More – and the full PS archive.
From semiconductors to electric vehicles, governments are identifying the strategic industries of the future and intervening to support them – abandoning decades of neoliberal orthodoxy in the process. Are industrial policies the key to tackling twenty-first-century economic challenges or a recipe for market distortions and lower efficiency?
伦敦——
在美国和北约士兵在阿富汗准备过第十次圣诞节之际，一个新词非常流行，传播广泛。这个新词就是“交接”，即在外国军队撤出之前，国际将安全责任交给阿富汗军队的过程，交接准备过程于2011年春开始。但是为了让普通士兵从这个新术语中获得的希望变为现实，西方领导人必须制定一项明确的阿富汗政治战略，如果没有这样一项战略，阿富汗将仍然处于战争中。
美国和欧洲军事和文官领导人一再表示纯粹的军事行动无法结束阿富汗战争。然而，北约的成员国不知道怎么解决所面临的问题：政治的解决方法需要什么？相反，它们更喜欢采取军事为主的计划，提高阿富汗军队和警察的能力，同时又应付国内压力，以表明阿富汗不会是一次没完没了的冲突。
To continue reading, register now.
Subscribe now for unlimited access to everything PS has to offer.
Subscribe
As a registered user, you can enjoy more PS content every month – for free.
Register
Already have an account? Log in