La vérité sur le partage des charges de l’Otan

BRUXELLES – Lorsqu’ils abordent le sujet de l’Afghanistan, beaucoup de journaux suggèrent encore que certains alliés de l’Otan ne se comportent pas comme ils le devraient sur place, et sont soit incapables, soit réticents à faire un plus grand effort. Naturellement, ces alliés estiment quant à eux que leurs efforts sont sous-estimés. Mais qu’est-ce, en fin de compte, qu’une charge juste et équitable ?

Tout d’abord, le débat sur le partage des charges (“ burden-sharing ”) ne doit pas se réduire à l’actualité des soldats déployés sur le sol afghan, car, aussi important que soit le niveau de ces troupes, il ne dévoile qu’une seule facette de la situation. Laissez-moi élargir le débat et proposer un point de vue plus holistique, en évoquant trois éléments interconnectés : la transformation de la défense, les opérations et le plus vaste contexte des efforts de la communauté internationale.

La transformation de la défense est un aspect-clé du partage des charges. Il est une règle d’or au sein de l’alliance, qui veut que la majorité des forces et des capacités de l’Otan soit la propriété de nations individuelles – la flotte du Système de détection et de commandement aéroporté (SDCA) de l’alliance est une exception. Comme je ne m’attends pas à voir les nations abandonner ce principe, l’Otan continuera à dépendre des alliés individuels et de leur volonté d’engager leurs ressources.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/jCXSq5b/fr;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now