El lenguaje secreto de los banqueros centrales

"Si les doy la impresión de ser indebidamente claro", les dijo Alan Greenspan a sus amos políticos en el Congreso de Estados Unidos, "deben de haber malinterpretado lo que dije". Corría el año 1987 y el presidente recientemente confirmado de la Reserva Federal estaba refiriéndose a cómo había "aprendido a mascullar con una gran incoherencia" en los breves seis meses desde que "se había convertido en un banquero central".

Greenspan estaba profundamente convencido, en la práctica si no en la teoría -¿quién podría entender su teoría después de todo?- de que los banqueros centrales debían hablar en un dialecto opaco y enrevesado. En comparación, el oráculo en el consejo de Delfos al rey de Lidia -"Si atacan Persia, destruirán un gran reino"- es la claridad misma.

Existía un viejo argumento para el "Greenspanés": los votantes o los políticos o ambos son inherentemente cortos de vista y miopes. Siempre verían y querrían aprehender los beneficios de las tasas de interés más bajas y un poco más de presión de la demanda -más producción, más empleo, mayores salarios y mayores beneficios en el corto plazo-. Pero o no verían o serían cínicamente indiferentes a los problemas del estancamiento que inevitablemente vendrían después. La tarea del banco central, según el antecesor distante de Greenspan, William McChesney Martin, consistía en “retirar el recipiente de (bajas tasas de interés) antes de que la fiesta realmente se ponga buena”.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now