¿Causaron los impuestos la crisis financiera?

CAMBRIDGE – Después de que estallara la crisis financiera en 2008, muchos observadores achacaron la crisis en gran parte al hecho de que muchas entidades financieras se habían cargado de deuda y dependían sólo de una fina capa de fondos propios. La razón es sencilla: mientras que los fondos propios pueden absorber una contracción del negocio –los beneficios disminuyen, pero la entidad no quiebra inmediatamente-, la deuda es menos indulgente, porque los acreedores no esperan con paciencia a que se les pague. Los acreedores a corto plazo o cobran o se niegan a refinanciar sus préstamos, con lo que deniegan el crédito a entidades financieramente debilitadas. Los acreedores a largo plazo piden que se los “resarza” y demandan judicialmente. Sin liquidez, la entidad quiebra.

Las entidades financieras de los Estados Unidos pagan un 34 por ciento, aproximadamente, de sus beneficios en impuestos y, si bien pueden deducirse del valor gravable los pagos de intereses a acreedores, los fondos propios reciben un trato menos favorable. La mayoría de los países tienen preferencias tributarias similares por la deuda frente a los fondos propios, con lo que –como saben los analistas financieros desde hace mucho– fomentan el recurso de las entidades financieras y de otra índole a más deuda.

Y, sin embargo, se rechazó rápidamente el argumento de que esa preferencia tributaria por la deuda desempeñó un papel en la crisis financiera y de que sigue siendo un riesgo permanente para la estabilidad financiera. Al fin y al cabo, la preferencia tributaria por la deuda ha existido desde hace mucho tiempo y nada la intensificó antes de que estallara la crisis. Al contrario, si acaso: la preferencia tributaria ha disminuido un poco con el tiempo. Y la crisis estuvo clarísimamente vinculada con la explosión de los valores respaldados por hipotecas de riesgo en los Estados Unidos; cuando el mercado comprendió abruptamente que no se podían pagar totalmente esos valores, se consideró que muchas entidades financieras sistémicamente importantes eran más débiles de lo que habían parecido, a lo que siguieron consecuencias económicas catastróficas.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. Television sets showing a news report on Xi Jinping's speech Anthony Wallace/Getty Images

    Empowering China’s New Miracle Workers

    China’s success in the next five years will depend largely on how well the government manages the tensions underlying its complex agenda. In particular, China’s leaders will need to balance a muscular Communist Party, setting standards and protecting the public interest, with an empowered market, driving the economy into the future.

  2. United States Supreme Court Hisham Ibrahim/Getty Images

    The Sovereignty that Really Matters

    The preference of some countries to isolate themselves within their borders is anachronistic and self-defeating, but it would be a serious mistake for others, fearing contagion, to respond by imposing strict isolation. Even in states that have succumbed to reductionist discourses, much of the population has not.

  3.  The price of Euro and US dollars Daniel Leal Olivas/Getty Images

    Resurrecting Creditor Adjustment

    When the Bretton Woods Agreement was hashed out in 1944, it was agreed that countries with current-account deficits should be able to limit temporarily purchases of goods from countries running surpluses. In the ensuing 73 years, the so-called "scarce-currency clause" has been largely forgotten; but it may be time to bring it back.

  4. Leaders of the Russian Revolution in Red Square Keystone France/Getty Images

    Trump’s Republican Collaborators

    Republican leaders have a choice: they can either continue to collaborate with President Donald Trump, thereby courting disaster, or they can renounce him, finally putting their country’s democracy ahead of loyalty to their party tribe. They are hardly the first politicians to face such a decision.

  5. Angela Merkel, Theresa May and Emmanuel Macron John Thys/Getty Images

    How Money Could Unblock the Brexit Talks

    With talks on the UK's withdrawal from the EU stalled, negotiators should shift to the temporary “transition” Prime Minister Theresa May officially requested last month. Above all, the negotiators should focus immediately on the British budget contributions that will be required to make an orderly transition possible.

  6. Ksenia Sobchak Mladlen Antonov/Getty Images

    Is Vladimir Putin Losing His Grip?

    In recent decades, as President Vladimir Putin has entrenched his authority, Russia has seemed to be moving backward socially and economically. But while the Kremlin knows that it must reverse this trajectory, genuine reform would be incompatible with the kleptocratic character of Putin’s regime.

  7. Right-wing parties hold conference Thomas Lohnes/Getty Images

    Rage Against the Elites

    • With the advantage of hindsight, four recent books bring to bear diverse perspectives on the West’s current populist moment. 
    • Taken together, they help us to understand what that moment is and how it arrived, while reminding us that history is contingent, not inevitable

    Global Bookmark

    Distinguished thinkers review the world’s most important new books on politics, economics, and international affairs.

  8. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin Bill Clark/Getty Images

    Don’t Bank on Bankruptcy for Banks

    As a part of their efforts to roll back the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, congressional Republicans have approved a measure that would have courts, rather than regulators, oversee megabank bankruptcies. It is now up to the Trump administration to decide if it wants to set the stage for a repeat of the Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008.