Le viol des libertés en Birmanie

La violence sexiste est un frein à la paix et au développement, notamment quand une dictature militaire l'utilise comme arme par contre son propre peuple. La Birmanie connaît maintenant cette violence entretenue par l'Etat.

L'utilisation généralisée de la violence sexiste en Birmanie est connue depuis que le Shan Women’s Action Network (Réseau d'action des femmes Shan, SWAN) et la Shan Human Rights Foundation (Fondation Shan pour les droits humains, SHRF) ont publié un rapport intitulé Licence to Rape (Permis de violer) qui recense 625 cas de viol commis par des militaires dans l'est du pays entre 1996 et 2001. Le rapport indique que ces faits n'ont donné lieu à aucune poursuite.

La Birmanie souffre des conséquences de décennies de guerre civile. Les civils sont les principales victimes d'une stratégie visant à saper le soutien populaire aux différentes guérillas qui combattent le gouvernement. Cela s'est traduit par le travail forcé, l'utilisation de la population dans les opérations de déminage et le déplacement massif de la population de villages entiers. Il y a aujourd'hui en Birmanie entre 600.000 et un million de personnes déplacées à l'intérieur même du pays.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/g7PifYy/fr;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now