La brecha de poder

No debe sorprender que la gira por Europa del presidente Bush haya sido recibida con protestas desde Berlín hasta Roma. Lo sorprendente es que, dadas las diferencias que actualmente están surgiendo entre los EU y sus aliados (la palabra cisma puede no ser inapropiada), los encuentros de Bush con los líderes europeos hayan transcurrido sin ningún problema. Esas diferencias no son sólo sobre Israel, o las tarifas a las importaciones de acero de la UE, o la posibilidad de que los tribunales estadounidenses impongan la pena de muerte a presuntos terroristas que tengan pasaportes europeos, sino que cada vez más encarnan una visión fundamentalmente distinta sobre la manera en la que el mundo debe funcionar.

Durante la Guerra Fría, cuando el Occidente temía un ataque por parte del bloque soviético, los EU y Europa se unieron a través de la OTAN para encarar esa amenaza. Hoy en día, cuando el temor principal en los países occidentales es la inestabilidad internacional y el terrorismo, los aliados de la OTAN están mucho menos unidos en cuanto a la forma de responder.

Esto es en parte una cuestión de diferencias transatlánticas en los niveles de gasto para la defensa y, por lo tanto, en la capacidad militar. Los EU gastan mucho más en defensa que sus aliados europeos y, como resultado, su capacidad militar es distinta, tanto en calidad como en cantidad.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/UZDJNnm/es;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now