Les politiques de la catastrophe cosmique

WASHINGTON – Le monde va devoir prendre une décision importante en 2010. Anatoly Perminov, responsable de l’Agence spatiale russe Roscosmos, propose d’envoyer une mission inhabitée pour détourner un gros astéroïde qui pourrait entrer en collision avec la Terre après 2030.

Avec un diamètre de plus de 360 mètres, l’astéroïde Apophis est douze fois plus gros que l’objet céleste Tunguska (dont on pense que c’était un météorite ou une comète) qui ravageât une grande part de l’est Sibérien il y a un siècle. Les recherches ont permis de déterminer que l’objet a éclaté le 30 juin 1908 avec une force équivalente à celle d’une arme nucléaire, déracinant quelques 80 millions d’arbres sur une zone de plus de 2 000 kilomètres carrés.

Selon la NASA, si Apophis entrait en collision avec la terre, le choc pourrait relâcher 100 000 fois plus d’énergie que l’épisode Tunguska. Des milliers de kilomètres carrés pourraient non seulement disparaître en poussière mais la Terre entière souffrirait de la perte de la lumière solaire et des autres effets résultants de la poussière qui serait alors libérée dans l’atmosphère. Ce risque explique pourquoi un analyste russe a appelé Apophis un «  terroriste céleste . »

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now