Spies versus Scribes

America's National Security Agency is mounting a full-scale public-relations campaign to rebut criticism of its surveillance programs. But it is also taking aim at those who would report about those programs.

NEW YORK – The recent guilty plea by Donald Sachtleben, a former FBI bomb technician charged with leaking classified information, after government investigators identified him by secretly obtaining the phone logs of some Associated Press reporters, represents the latest chapter in the ongoing drama over United States security officials’ behavior.

A few days earlier, another chapter played out in a New York City television studio: spies and recipients of leaked information confronted each other onstage. It was a remarkable event, for an audience of 400 journalists. I was present.

The venue was a taping of the US interview program “Charlie Rose: The Week.” Stewart Baker, the National Security Agency’s former general counsel, defended the agency against criticism it has faced since former intelligence contractor Edward J. Snowden leaked thousands of documents exposing the scope of its surveillance activities to the Guardian columnist Glenn Greenwald. Joining Baker on the dais were two journalists of great courage, Janine Gibson, Editor-in-Chief of Guardian US, and Alan Rusbridger, the Guardian’s editor.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To continue reading, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.

required

By proceeding, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions.

Log in

http://prosyn.org/TbKA4qS;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.