L’Ukraine revient de loin

Le soupir de soulagement que l'Europe poussa lorsque la dispute entre la Russie et l’Ukraine sur le prix du gaz s’est soi-disant résolue pouvait s’entendre jusqu’à Kiev. Mais l’accord risque de soulever plus de questions qu’il n’apporte de réponse. En plaçant les besoins en énergie de l’Ukraine dans les mains d’une entreprise fantôme liée à un gang de criminels international, cet accord a créé les bases de nouvelles crises qui pourraient se révéler plus dangereuses.

C’est pour cela que je remets en cause cet accord devant les tribunaux. Qu’un débat public devant la justice fasse ressortir exactement qui seront les bénéficiaires de cet accord.

Cet accord entre l’Ukraine et Gazprom, l’entreprise d’Etat russe qui détient le monopole du gaz, est intolérable car le futur énergétique de l’Ukraine vient d’être placé dans les mains de RosUkrEnergo, chancre criminel accroché au corps de notre société de gaz. RosUkrEnergo fut créée vers la fin du régime de notre dirigeant précédent, Léonide Kuchma. Pourtant, elle a pris, miraculeusement, le contrôle des importations ukrainiennes de gaz en provenance d’Asie centrale. Selon l’accord mis en place cette semaine, elle gardera ce contrôle.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now