Las elecciones defectuosas de los Estados Unidos

PRINCETON – Sin duda muchas personas en todo el mundo, si no es que la mayoría, sintieron alivio porque el presidente estadounidense, Barack Obama logró reelegirse. La BBC realizó una encuesta  en 21 países y los resultados mostraron una fuerte preferencia por Obama casi en todos lados excepto en Pakistán. Sin embargo, la alegría por la victoria de Obama no debe impedirnos ver que estuvieron ausentes una serie de puntos de referencias éticos para unas elecciones democráticas.

De acuerdo con el Centro para una Política Responsable con sede en Estados Unidos, el gasto en las elecciones –para Presidente y Congreso, incluido el gasto de grupos externos así como de los candidatos y sus partidos políticos– se calcula rebasó los 6 mil millones de dólares. Ello significa que estas elecciones de 2012 han sido las más caras de la historia de los Estados Unidos.

Una gran parte del gasto la dedicaron ambos partidos a neutralizarse entre sí. Esto solo beneficia a las agencias de publicidad y los medios de comunicación, a nadie más, tampoco a los partidos ni a los espectadores, que se ven abrumados con infinidad de anuncios, sobre todo si viven en estados altamente divididos y disputados. Es difícil pensar que, por ejemplo, unos 200 millones de dólares no habrían sido suficientes para informar adecuadamente al electorado sobre las políticas de los candidatos.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/8mHtGGU/es;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now