La masacre judicial de Srebrenica

El juicio de la Corte Internacional de Justicia (CIJ) referido a la participación de Serbia en la masacre de musulmanes bosnios en Srebrenica en 1995 debería verse con una ambivalencia considerable. Por un lado, el hecho de que un tribunal internacional se haya pronunciado sobre la responsabilidad de un Estado en una cuestión de genocidio es un avance innegablemente positivo. Pero por otro lado, la decisión de la Corte es uno de esos pronunciamientos judiciales que intenta complacer a todo el mundo y deja todo como estaba.

Se suponía que la Corte no responsabilizaría penalmente a individuos específicos; ésa es tarea del Tribunal Penal Internacional para la ex Yugoslavia (TPIY). La CIJ, que más bien se ocupa de controversias entre Estados, se vio enfrentada al reclamo de Bosnia de que Serbia era responsable de la masacre de Srebrenica. Si bien la Corte dictaminó que el genocidio había tenido lugar, decidió que Serbia no era responsable según el derecho internacional.

Según la Corte, los generales serbios bosnios que eran culpables de este genocidio, los diversos Mladic y Kristic, no actuaban como agentes de Serbia ni recibían instrucciones específicas de Belgrado. Por ende, no se le podía imputar el genocidio a Serbia, aunque el gobierno serbio le pagara sueldos a Mladic y sus colegas, al mismo tiempo que les proporcionaba asistencia financiera y militar. Serbia tampoco fue culpable de complicidad ya que, si bien ejercía considerable influencia sobre Mladic y su gente, no sabía, en el momento en que tenía lugar el genocidio, que se estaba cometiendo un crimen de esta naturaleza.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/wsmdFew/es;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now