Paul Lachine

Une nouvelle saignée ?

BERKELEY – Au cours des douze années de la Grande Dépression, entre le krach boursier de 1929 et la mobilisation des États-Unis dans la Deuxième Guerre mondiale, la production aux Etats-Unis se situait en moyenne autour de 15% en-deçà de la tendance d'avant la Dépression, ce qui implique un déficit total égal à 1,8 an de PIB. Aujourd'hui, même si la production des États-Unis revient à son potentiel à inflation stable en 2017 (ce qui est loin d'être certain), les États-Unis auront subi un manque à gagner équivalent à 60% du PIB annuel.

En fait les pertes de ce que j'ai appelé la « Petite Dépression » ne seront certainement pas terminées en 2017. Il n'y a pas d'équivalent moral à la guerre pour emporter les États-Unis dans une croissance forte et effacer l'ombre portée de la récession. Quand je prends les valeurs actuelles et que je projette la croissance à tendance inférieure de l'économie américaine dans l'avenir, je ne peux pas compter la valeur actualisée de la perte supplémentaire à moins de 100% du résultat annuel d'aujourd'hui, pour un coût total de 1,6 années de PIB. Les dégâts sont donc presque égaux à ceux de la Grande Dépression et tout aussi douloureux, même si le PIB réel actuel des États-Unis est 12 fois supérieur à ce qu'il était en 1929.

Quand je parle à mes amis de l'administration Obama, ils se défendent et défendent le résultat macroéconomique à long terme des États-Unis en soulignant que le reste du monde développé fait bien pire. Ils ont raison. L'Europe souhaite désespérément avoir les problèmes des États-Unis.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/B2OLqmg/fr;
  1. Television sets showing a news report on Xi Jinping's speech Anthony Wallace/Getty Images

    Empowering China’s New Miracle Workers

    China’s success in the next five years will depend largely on how well the government manages the tensions underlying its complex agenda. In particular, China’s leaders will need to balance a muscular Communist Party, setting standards and protecting the public interest, with an empowered market, driving the economy into the future.

  2. United States Supreme Court Hisham Ibrahim/Getty Images

    The Sovereignty that Really Matters

    The preference of some countries to isolate themselves within their borders is anachronistic and self-defeating, but it would be a serious mistake for others, fearing contagion, to respond by imposing strict isolation. Even in states that have succumbed to reductionist discourses, much of the population has not.

  3.  The price of Euro and US dollars Daniel Leal Olivas/Getty Images

    Resurrecting Creditor Adjustment

    When the Bretton Woods Agreement was hashed out in 1944, it was agreed that countries with current-account deficits should be able to limit temporarily purchases of goods from countries running surpluses. In the ensuing 73 years, the so-called "scarce-currency clause" has been largely forgotten; but it may be time to bring it back.

  4. Leaders of the Russian Revolution in Red Square Keystone France/Getty Images

    Trump’s Republican Collaborators

    Republican leaders have a choice: they can either continue to collaborate with President Donald Trump, thereby courting disaster, or they can renounce him, finally putting their country’s democracy ahead of loyalty to their party tribe. They are hardly the first politicians to face such a decision.

  5. Angela Merkel, Theresa May and Emmanuel Macron John Thys/Getty Images

    How Money Could Unblock the Brexit Talks

    With talks on the UK's withdrawal from the EU stalled, negotiators should shift to the temporary “transition” Prime Minister Theresa May officially requested last month. Above all, the negotiators should focus immediately on the British budget contributions that will be required to make an orderly transition possible.

  6. Ksenia Sobchak Mladlen Antonov/Getty Images

    Is Vladimir Putin Losing His Grip?

    In recent decades, as President Vladimir Putin has entrenched his authority, Russia has seemed to be moving backward socially and economically. But while the Kremlin knows that it must reverse this trajectory, genuine reform would be incompatible with the kleptocratic character of Putin’s regime.

  7. Right-wing parties hold conference Thomas Lohnes/Getty Images

    Rage Against the Elites

    • With the advantage of hindsight, four recent books bring to bear diverse perspectives on the West’s current populist moment. 
    • Taken together, they help us to understand what that moment is and how it arrived, while reminding us that history is contingent, not inevitable


    Global Bookmark

    Distinguished thinkers review the world’s most important new books on politics, economics, and international affairs.

  8. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin Bill Clark/Getty Images

    Don’t Bank on Bankruptcy for Banks

    As a part of their efforts to roll back the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, congressional Republicans have approved a measure that would have courts, rather than regulators, oversee megabank bankruptcies. It is now up to the Trump administration to decide if it wants to set the stage for a repeat of the Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008.