The Fire Down Below

WARSAW: Bombing Serbia and Serb forces in Kosovo are not exactly what NATO's new members in Central Europe expected when they joined the West's premier security organization. Poland, but also Hungary and the Czech Republic, believed they were joining yesterday's NATO - an alliance to protect Europe against threats from the East. It is this goal that made them mobilize resources and public opinion in order to join the privileged group. Now they find themselves in an organization in the process of radical transformation.

It is said of NATO's attack on Serbia that it is the first war of the 21st century. Fighting in Kosovo is the first significant conflict which, for one side at least, involves no considerations of strategy, territory, population, natural resources, or even ideology. The West is fighting a war over principles, a war, as President Clinton put it, "to end a moral tragedy." At issue is an attempt to stop an epidemic, the carriers of which in 20th century Europe have been nazism, communism, fascism, and now, nationalism.

NATO, for the first time, has intervened in the internal affairs of another country. This is a significant change in NATO policy, which downgrades the idea of the sovereignty of states and elevates the status of ethical norms in international relations. A lot seems to rest on a consensus about moral norms and about who is right and who is wrong. While few question the immorality of Serbs' behavior, future moral crusades may be more controversial.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now