In less than four years, Russia has undergone an astonishing sea change. Macroeconomic stabilization is but the start. Underlying the economy's rapid recovery is the emergence of a common set of fundamental political values. No one questions whether private property should be the basis of economic life. Tight monetary and fiscal policies are now de rigueur (until quite recently printing money to finance the budget deficit was widely considered acceptable). All major political forces (even of the left) support reducing taxes.
In short, the ideological vestiges of communist economics have been swept away. The achievement of broad political consensus means that institutional change can now become more purpose-oriented and consistent. Indeed, the consolidation of political parties has given Russia's government a stable parliamentary majority for the first time since the postcommunist transition began.
But, unlike economic stabilization, near-universal rules do not apply to institutional reform. While there has been noticeable progress on the legal framework of the strategic plan that the government unveiled in 2000 (the so-called "Gref Program," named after Economics Minister German Greff), a breakthrough has yet to be achieved. Of more than one hundred reforms planned for 2000-2001, little more than a dozen were fully implemented.
To continue reading, register now.
Subscribe now for unlimited access to everything PS has to offer.
China’s exceptional growth in recent decades has influenced the education and career choices of young people and their families. But now that high-skilled jobs are drying up and recent graduates are struggling to find work, there is a growing mismatch between expectations and new realities.
argues that the rise in joblessness among young people does not spell economic apocalypse for China.
Since 1960, only a few countries in Latin America have narrowed the gap between their per capita income and that of the United States, while most of the region has lagged far behind. Making up for lost ground will require a coordinated effort, involving both technocratic tinkering and bold political leadership.
explain what it will take finally to achieve economic convergence with advanced economies.
In less than four years, Russia has undergone an astonishing sea change. Macroeconomic stabilization is but the start. Underlying the economy's rapid recovery is the emergence of a common set of fundamental political values. No one questions whether private property should be the basis of economic life. Tight monetary and fiscal policies are now de rigueur (until quite recently printing money to finance the budget deficit was widely considered acceptable). All major political forces (even of the left) support reducing taxes.
In short, the ideological vestiges of communist economics have been swept away. The achievement of broad political consensus means that institutional change can now become more purpose-oriented and consistent. Indeed, the consolidation of political parties has given Russia's government a stable parliamentary majority for the first time since the postcommunist transition began.
But, unlike economic stabilization, near-universal rules do not apply to institutional reform. While there has been noticeable progress on the legal framework of the strategic plan that the government unveiled in 2000 (the so-called "Gref Program," named after Economics Minister German Greff), a breakthrough has yet to be achieved. Of more than one hundred reforms planned for 2000-2001, little more than a dozen were fully implemented.
To continue reading, register now.
Subscribe now for unlimited access to everything PS has to offer.
Subscribe
As a registered user, you can enjoy more PS content every month – for free.
Register
Already have an account? Log in