La inacabable crisis nuclear iraní

Irán continuará enriqueciendo uranio, sin importar si el presidente de EE.UU. es demócrata o republicano. Al mismo tiempo, Estados Unidos se opondrá a cualquier plan nuclear iraní -incluso un programa civil-, porque contribuiría a la estabilidad del régimen de Teherán. Como resultado, es probable que las tensiones nucleares emponzoñen las relaciones entre estos dos países por muchos años más.

A menudo se dice que Irán no tiene necesidad de energía nuclear, puesto que posee abundantes reservas de petróleo y gas natural. Sin embargo, el gobierno iraní se encuentra bajo presión económica y política para suministrar cantidades cada vez mayores de electricidad a su creciente población y a su frágil economía. El uso de petróleo o gas natural para producir electricidad doméstica amenaza las exportaciones de estos recursos, que son la principal fuente de ingresos para el gobierno. De hecho, con un consumo interno de petróleo que crece más rápidamente que la producción, los ingresos del gobierno ya están en declive.

Así, la energía nuclear detendrá la disminución de los ingresos del gobierno al liberar más petróleo y gas natural para su exportación. Si se desarrollan, los recursos de gas natural de Irán no serían un sustituto para una energía nuclear barata, ya que el gas es más rentable en otros usos que en la generación de energía.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now