Le paradoxe de la crise iranienne

L'Iran continuera à enrichir de l'uranium, que le président américain soit républicain ou démocrate. De leur coté, les USA s'opposent à tout programme nucléaire iranien, même civil, car il contribue à la stabilité du régime de Téhéran. Aussi, les tensions autour du nucléaire iranien vont sans doute perturber les relations irano-américaine durant encore quelques années.

On entend souvent dire que l'Iran, du fait de ses ressources pétrolières et de ses réserves en gaz naturel, n'a pas besoin du nucléaire. Mais dans le contexte d'une économie fragile et des pressions politiques dont il est l'objet, le gouvernement iranien doit fournir davantage d'électricité à une population qui augmente. Les quantités croissantes de pétrole et de gaz naturel destinées à produire de l'électricité à son propre usage menacent les exportations de ces produits, première source de revenue de l'Etat. La consommation intérieure de pétrole augmentant plus rapidement que la production, les revenus liés aux exportations de pétrole sont déjà en baisse.

L'énergie nucléaire permettrait de mettre fin à la baisse des revenus de l'Etat, car le pétrole et le gaz ainsi économisés pourraient être exportés. Les réserves iraniennes en gaz naturel ne sont pas un substitut à l'énergie nucléaire bon marché, car son utilisation est plus rentable dans d'autres secteurs que celui de la production d'électricité.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/T9zQ8i2/fr;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now