民主悖论

巴黎——

伊朗的选举,其结果被偷梁换柱;阿富汗的选举,又引发了众多争议;而加蓬的选举,则更如东施效颦般可笑。近期在这些以及其他许多国家进行的投票活动,与其说是标志着民主在全球范围的推进,不如说是展示出了法治的缺失。

当然,造成有违自由的结果、甚至催生出专制制度的选举并非一种新的现象。毕竟,希特勒便是在1933年通过一次自由、公平、且有竞争可言的选举获得了德国政权。此外,存在问题的选举对于西方构成了一种特别的挑战,西方既作为普世民主讯息的传递者,又身负着往日的罪责,对那段破坏了民主讯息可信度与效用的帝国主义历史负有责任。

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To access our archive, please log in or register now and read two articles from our archive every month for free. For unlimited access to our archive, as well as to the unrivaled analysis of PS On Point, subscribe now.

required

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in

http://prosyn.org/adY6qA1/zh;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.