El lado oscuro de defender la libertad

BRUSELAS: Se dice que el precio de la libertad es la eterna vigilancia, pero ese precio puede adoptar la forma de decisiones moralmente sórdidas en las que gente inocente carga con el coste de la defensa de la libertad.

Bajo la égida de la Guerra Fría, los gobiernos occidentales se vieron obligados con regularidad a tomar muchas decisiones estratégicamente realistas pero moralmente nocivas. Dictadores como Mobuto de Zaire y Suharto de Indonesia fueron aceptados por el principio de que "puede que sea un bastardo, pero al menos es nuestro bastardo". Además, toda suerte de "luchadores por la libertad" desde los Contras en Nicaragua a Hissene Habré en Chad y Jonas Savimbi en Uganda recibieron armas y respaldo político de Occidente. Hasta los genocidas del Khmer Rouge fueron defendidos, en parte y por breve tiempo, por Estados Unidos en sus reductos en los bosques tras su expulsión de Phnom Penh.

Veinte años después del fin de la Guerra Fría, en ocasiones Occidente ha reconocido su deber de compensar a quienes fueron, en un sentido muy real, el "daño colateral" de esa lucha ideológica. Por ejemplo, los países que Roosevelt y Churchill entregaron al implacable dominio de Stalin son ahora, en su mayoría, parte de la Unión Europea. Sin embargo, hay otras historias no contadas de personas que pagaron caro las libertades de Occidente y que no han recibido demasiada atención.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/bc5mREQ/es;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now