Ce que les BRICS peuvent offrir au monde

CAMBRIDGE – Jim O’Neill de Goldman Sachs avait inventé en 2001 l’acronyme BRIC pour désigner les quatre plus importantes économies mondiales en développement – Brésil, Russie, Inde, et Chine. Plus d’une décennie plus tard, leur seul point commun est d’être les seules économies non membres de l’OCDE à être classées dans les 15 premières mondiales (en pouvoir d’achat).

Ces quatre pays ont des structures économiques très différentes : la Russie et le Brésil reposent sur leurs ressources naturelles, l’Inde, sur ses services, et la Chine, sur son secteur manufacturier. Le Brésil et l’Inde sont des démocraties tandis que la Chine et la Russie ne le sont vraiment pas. Et ainsi que l’écrit Joseph Nye, la Russie est une superpuissance en déclin, tandis que la Chine et les autres (dans une moindre mesure) sont en progression.

Pourtant, comme dans un rêve, les BRICS – les quatre pays d’origine rejoints désormais par l’Afrique du Sud – se sont créés leur propre forum avec des réunions régulières et des initiatives politiques. Leur effort le plus ambitieux à ce jour a été l’établissement d’une banque du développement.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/TxhAHev/fr;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now