The Brain-Drain Panic Returns

Jan 27, 2012 Jagdish Bhagwati

While developed countries are angst-ridden over mostly illegal immigration by unskilled workers from developing countries, a different set of concerns has surfaced in Africa, in particular, over the legal outflow of skilled people to developed countries. But these concerns are misplaced.

NEW YORK – While developed countries are angst-ridden over mostly illegal immigration by unskilled workers from developing countries, a different set of concerns has surfaced in Africa, in particular, over the legal outflow of skilled, and even more importantly, highly skilled, people to developed countries. This outflow is supposedly a new and damaging “brain drain,” with rich countries actively luring away needed skills from poor countries.

This fear is misplaced. At the outset, we have to distinguish between “need” and “demand.” Yes, many African countries need skills. But they are unable to absorb them, owing to several factors associated with economic backwardness.

In India in the 1950’s and 1960’s – a time when many professionals were emigrating – working conditions were deplorable. Bureaucrats decided whether we could go abroad for conferences. Heads of departments carried inordinate power. So, no surprise, many of us left. We Hindus may believe in an infinity of lifetimes, but we maximize our welfare in this one, just like everyone else.

We hope you're enjoying Project Syndicate.

To continue reading, subscribe now.

Get unlimited access to PS premium content, including in-depth commentaries, book reviews, exclusive interviews, On Point, the Big Picture, the PS Archive, and our annual year-ahead magazine.

Already have an account or want to create one to read two commentaries for free? Log in

Support High-Quality Commentary

As the COVID-19 pandemic escalates, and its effects reverberate around the world, Project Syndicate is delivering the expert scientific, economic, and political insights that people need. For more than 25 years, we have been guided by a simple credo: All people deserve access to a broad range of views by the world's foremost leaders and thinkers on the issues, events, and forces shaping their lives. In this crisis, that mission is more important than ever – and we remain committed to fulfilling it.

But there is no doubt that the intensifying crisis puts us, like so many other organizations, under growing strain. If you are in a position to support us, please subscribe now.

As a subscriber, you will enjoy unlimited access to our On Point suite of long reads and book reviews, Say More contributor interviews, The Year Ahead magazine, the full PS archive, and much more. You will also directly support our mission of delivering the highest-quality commentary on the world's most pressing issues – including the latest outbreak-related developments – to as wide an audience as possible.

By helping us to build a truly open world of ideas, every PS subscriber makes a real difference. Thank you.

Subscribe Now

Jagdish Bhagwati

Writing for PS since 2010
28 Commentaries

Jagdish Bhagwati is University Professor of Law and Economics at Columbia University and Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. A renowned expert on international trade, he has served in top-level advisory positions for the World Trade Organization and the United Nations, including Economic Policy Adviser to the Director-General, GATT (1991-93), and Special Adviser to the UN on globalization. He is the author of many books, including In Defense of Globalization.

new comment has been posted. new comments have been posted.

0 Comments on this paragraph, 3 in all 3 Comments on this article

Roman Bleifer Mar 22, 2012

The processes of labor migration is a consequence of globalization. As the global financial crisis and the formation of elements of the new production system and the international division of labor ( http://crisismir.com/analiticheskie-materialy/ekonomika/13-mirovoj-ekonomicheskij-krizis-prichiny-i-posledstviya-quo-vadis.html ), and migration processes will only increase. Is that a fair process for those mipratsii or other countries, it is a matter of morality rather than economics.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Kristy Mayer Feb 16, 2012

Your proposals seem to omit a potentially significant institutional mechanism to mitigate the outflow of highly skilled workers. As you note, working conditions in developing countries can be “deplorable” (or, at least, frustrating for skilled workers). This is true for the reasons you cite, but also because many developing countries lack the institutional capacity to effectively leverage their skilled workers, significantly impeding skilled workers’ ability to have a positive impact in their home countries. For a skilled individual, the choice between working in a dysfunctional domestic institution and working on the same issues at a relatively effective international institution is likely often simple. Thus, for a country to retain its skilled workers, it must start by reforming its institutions – by combating corruption, improving institutions’ ability to implement reforms, increasing transparency – so that workers’ skills can have an impact closer to their full potential.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Kristy Mayer Feb 16, 2012

You suggest meeting the current demand for highly skilled workers through a “Grey Peace Corps” of skilled senior citizens from developed countries. While these individuals would certainly be able to meet some of a country’s skills demand, they lack the deep cultural understanding and inherent motivation of native workers. The Grey Peace Corps could be a useful near-term stop-gap measure in situations of dire need, but otherwise, countries would be better served by devoting resources to improving institutional capacity and otherwise enticing skilled workers to remain at home.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.