Paul Lachine

Prime et risque : quelle relation ?

CHICAGO – Lors de sa session de juillet, le Parlement européen a adopté la réglementation la plus sévère du monde concernant les primes versées aux banquiers, ceci dans le but de limiter les risques que prennent les institutions financières.

Selon la nouvelle réglementation, la part de la prime immédiatement disponible des banquiers ne doit pas excéder 30% du total, le versement de 40 à 60% de son montant doit être ajourné d'au moins trois ans et au moins 50% doit être investi en capital conditionnel - une nouvelle forme de titre pouvant être transformé en fonds propres au cas où une firme financière se trouverait en difficulté. L'aspect le plus innovateur de cette nouvelle réglementation est le fait que ces limites ne s'appliquent pas uniquement aux pdg, mais à tous les cadres dirigeants (la définition de ce qu'est un cadre dirigeant étant de la responsabilité des parlements nationaux).

Ce sont les conséquences systémiques des primes qui servent de justification à cette interférence majeure du Parlement dans des contrats privés. Selon ce raisonnement, ces primes récompensent le succès alors que les échecs ne sont pas sanctionnés. Les gestionnaires financiers peuvent facilement aller de firme en firme quand les choses tournent mal, échappant ainsi à toute sanction. Ce système récompense ceux qui prennent des risques, même quand il est excessif. Cette distorsion serait l'une des principales causes de la crise financière de 2008.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now