The Beauty in Ugly Elections

Elections in countries that have been strangers to democracy are never pretty, as Afghanistan's recent vote demonstrated and as any election in Iraq is likely to be. But electoral flaws are not always the whole picture.

Consider Kazakhstan, where five million people cast ballots in September for their parliament's lower house. Western media judged the election a failure. CNN reported it "neither equitable nor free." The Economist snidely referred to the "results" in quotation marks. Most quoted the OSCE's finding that the elections were riddled with "serious shortcomings."

Those elections were flawed. But only a small percent of the breaches were the result of deliberate manipulation. We were there, and visited eight urban and rural polling places, talked with roughly a hundred voters, election officials and observers, as well as officials from six parties. The majority of shortcomings resulted from organizational ineptitude.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To read this article from our archive, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles from our archive every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.