Booms Estructurales

¿Por qué hay booms y caídas, esos largos movimientos pendulares entre el crecimiento y la desaceleración de la economía? Las explicaciones tradicionales se centran en las malas políticas monetarias. Mis investigaciones sostienen que son estructurales, el resultado de cambios fuertes en las expectativas sobre productividad y ganancias a futuro.

En el periodo entreguerras, los extremos eran las hiperinflaciones y las deflaciones profundas. No es de extrañar que para las escuelas austriaca, keynesiana y monetarista siempre fuera cuestión de cherchez la monnaie. Sin embargo, después de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, los largos movimientos pendulares continuaron, pero ya con patrones de inflación moderada. En los 1960 el desempleo casi desapareció en varios países europeos, pero sin que creciera la inflación. En los 1990 el empleo creció enormemente en varios países industrializados, de nuevo con inflación nula o mínima.

Yo considero estos movimientos ascendentes del ciclo pendular como booms en las iversiones que tienen causas y efectos estructurales. Los empresarios prevén nuevas oportunidades para el uso lucrativo del capital en el mediano plazo. Así, incrementan sus inversiones en instalaciones, clientes y empleados nuevos. Casi todas las inversiones empresariales generan mayor empleo, a través de canales no monetarios, sin el sobrecalentamiento inflacionario.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/hBkRbnI/es;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now