La scelta di Strauss-Kahn

CHICAGO – Quando l’ex Ministro delle Finanze Dominique Strauss-Kahn è stato nominato Amministratore delegato del Fondo Monetario Internazionale nel 2007, diversi paesi in via di sviluppo si sono opposti. Non a lui, bensì alla tradizione dell’FMI di assegnare le posizioni più importanti agli europei, così come gli americani piazzano uno di loro all’interno della Banca Mondiale.

Questo meccanismo antiquato di “spoil system” è un rimasuglio del periodo successivo alla Seconda Guerra mondiale durante il quale le potenze vincitrici si sono suddivise tra di loro le posizioni di leadership all’interno degli istituti di economia a livello mondiale. Al tempo queste disposizioni avevano un senso in quanto gli Stati Uniti rappresentavano il 35% dell’economia mondiale e l’Europa occidentale il 26%. Ma oggi l’equilibrio del potere economico è cambiato. Gli USA rappresentano solo il 20% dell’economia mondiale e l’Europa occidentale solo il 19%.

In realtà c’è una ragione ancor più inconfutabile, anche se al tempo non evidente, per cui il direttore dell’FMI nominato nel 2007 non avrebbe dovuto essere europeo, ovvero il conflitto di interessi.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/ZCoGOFA/it;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now