Dean Rohrer

Agresión del Estado y pasividad judicial

WASHINGTON, DC – Cuando los Estados miembros de la Corte Penal Internacional se reúnan en Kampala, Uganda a finales de este mes para celebrar una conferencia en la que se examinará la labor de la CPI, uno de los temas que estará en la agenda será si es necesario modificar el estatuto de la Corte para darle jurisdicción sobre el delito de agresión. Ese tema se aplazó cuando se adoptó el estatuto de la CPI en 1998. Sobre la base de mi experiencia como fiscal internacional y como firme defensor de la CPI creo que sería un grave error agregar el delito de agresión a su lista de casos en este momento. Hay que volver a aplazar el tema.

Como quiera que se mire, la CPI ha iniciado su trayecto con una firmeza que la ha permitido generar un apoyo global y demostrar su potencial para encarar el problema de la impunidad oficial por delitos internacionales graves. No obstante, también se ha enfrentado a acusaciones de politización y sigue aprendiendo, como institución, la forma de ejercer efectivamente su jurisdicción sobre el genocidio, los crímenes contra la humanidad y los crímenes de guerra.

La experiencia del Tribunal Penal Internacional para la ex Yugoslavia (ICTY por sus siglas en inglés), que también se ocupó de genocidios, crímenes contra la humanidad y crímenes de guerra, debe servir de advertencia a los miembros de la CPI cuando debatan si se debe agregar el delito de agresión a su jurisdicción.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now