Communist party members lay flowers at Stalins grave

Comments 4

La Unión Soviética murió para siempre

Dec 29, 2016 Ghia Nodia

MOSCÚ – Esta víspera de año nuevo señala el 25.º aniversario de la disolución formal de la Unión Soviética. Pero en vez de celebrar, muchos rusos (y algunas personas en Occidente) tienen sentimientos encontrados al respecto.

Primero en la lista de los dubitativos está el presidente ruso Vladimir Putin. Ya hizo saber su posición sobre la desintegración de la URSS en 2005, cuando la llamó “una gran tragedia geopolítica del siglo XX”. Y algunos en Occidente consideran que los nuevos estados surgidos del naufragio (en particular, Ucrania y las repúblicas del Báltico) son la principal causa del resentimiento y el revanchismo de Rusia en el mundo que siguió a la Guerra Fría.

Estas dudas contrastan marcadamente con el consenso que prevaleció por muchos años tras la caída del comunismo en Europa, producida entre 1989 y 1991. Todos coincidían en que el fin de la Guerra Fría suponía no sólo la liberación de Europa central y del este, sino también el triunfo de las ideas liberales.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To read this article from our archive, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles from our archive every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.

Featured

MAD About Sino-American Trade

Sep 20, 2018 Minxin Pei
Good Politics, Bad Economics

Sep 20, 2018 Robert Skidelsky
Japan’s Successful Economic Model

Sep 20, 2018 Adair Turner
The Immorality of Boris Johnson and Donald Trump

Sep 18, 2018 Chris Patten
Fresh Momentum for the Balkans

Sep 20, 2018 Javier Solana

new comment has been posted. new comments have been posted.

0 Comments on this paragraph, 5 in all 5 Comments on this article

j. von Hettlingen Dec 30, 2016

Ghia Nodia insists "the Soviet Union is dead for good." Ahead of the 25th anniversary of its dissolution on New Year's Eve, many Russians have no mood to celebrate, least of all Putin. In 2005 he called the event “a major geopolitical tragedy of the twentieth century.” He also begrudges former satellites "that emerged from the wreckage" as new independent states - "Ukraine and the Baltic republics, in particular." This bitter reality has since been "the primary source of Russia’s ressentiment and revanchism" in recent years.
Although it is widely acknowledged that "the end of the Cold War marked not only the liberation of Central and Eastern Europe, but also the triumph of liberal ideas," Putin seems determined to turn the clock back, and not to let the Soviet Union "die completely." The 2008 war with Georgia and the 2014 annexation of Crimea may have satisfied his ego and boosted his popularity at home, but his aggression "has also instilled fear among his neighbors."
Mikhail Gorbachev, George HW Bush and the late German chancellor, Helmut Kohl made history, when the Iron Curtain fell in Europe. The US emerged the winner, thanks partly to its own policies but also to the work of others. For two decades it enjoyed global supremacy as the sole hegemon - a status that has been seen as a thorn in Russia's side.
After the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, and the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe, the Soviet Union still existed, ruled by the Communist Party under Mikhail Gorbachev, who was weakened by a coup in August 1991. The Soviet leader was on holday in Crimea when he was imprisoned in his dacha by a group of plotters - hardline high-ranking officials within the Communist party - who tried and failed to stop his ambitious reforms that had begun shortly after he assumed power in 1985. They worried about Gorbachev's plans to create a looser Russian federation with certain powers devolving to Soviet republics like Ukraine. The plot was devised in the central committee building in Moscow by officials who feared the break-up of the Soviet Union. Russians reacted badly to the news that tanks were deployed. They took to the street, even Boris Yeltsin defiantly opposed it.
As the year 1991 drew to a close, Gorbachev's concern were the independence movements in a number of Soviet republics. On December 8 he signed "the Belovezha Accords, which formalized the break-up of the USSR." The speed of its demise raised fears for the future. Without popular support, the coup lost momentum and within three days it was over. But problems lied ahead for the newly-democratised Russia, which explained why only 14% of Russians view Yeltsin positively today.
The relationship between the dominant Russia and the fledgling sovereign states was problematic. Indeed, few foresaw just how quickly the Soviet Union would be dismantled so swiftly. Yeltsin wasted no time in removing the last vestiges of the Communist party's rule, and Gorbachev began with devolving central power, till he resigned on December 25, 1991. It was an astonishing historical turnaround. Many people - including the author - "in the heyday of the Soviet Union" all thought the USSR and the Cold War would go on indefinitely. "They did not dare to imagine that it would happen in a peaceful and orderly manner."
At the start of 1992, 15 newly-independent states - including Russia led by Yeltsin - stood in place. Given decades of submission to authoritarian rule, their path to self-determination has been tortuous. Democratisation process leaves much to be desired. "Some of these new nation-states have been struggling to develop democratic institutions and viable economies. Others, no surprise, became outright dictatorships." However "they are now accustomed to being the masters of their own fate, /that/ Putin will find this almost impossible to reverse." Indeed, everyone is guessing what else he has in mind to improve his own stature and "restore Russia’s lost greatness?" One thing we know about Putin, he loves to surprise us.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
David Morgan Dec 30, 2016

Russia has the same size economy as Italy, its conventional army is no match for NATO, it does, howver have a large nuclear arsonal which was not used during the Cold War so why would Putin use it now. The international community needs to stand up against him, and make him understand his country is an ex-super power and the sooner he realises it the better.
- S.A R Jan 14, 2017
  
  The lacking size of Soviet Union's economy never held it back from challenging the vastly economically superior U.S. and European powers allied with each other.
  
  It was the nuclear weapons that allowed for the situation to remain stable, as after the Cuban Missile Crisis neither side attempted to gain a decisive edge over the other or engage in nuclear provocations. Today the U.S. has a decisive edge over Russia. This has produced the current global turmoil as it is impossible for Russia to accept, so they must defend their interests extremely aggressively to hold further erosion of their geopolitical position at bay.
  A new reply to this comment has been posted.
- Alexandr Rubtsov Jan 4, 2017
  
  Международное сообщество должно понять, что рост западных экономик и Китая последние 25 лет вызван распадом СССР. Индустрия Советского союза была разрушена в угоду западным компаниям, которые нарастили производство. И теперь международное сообщество ждёт выбор - или оно добровольно компенсирует России потери или Россия восстановит СССР и сама вернёт себе былое величие.
  И не надо сравнивать экономики Италии и России. Россия прошла кризис, который только предстоит пройти итальянцам. Вот когда их банки обанкротятся, экономика упадёт, а Голдман сакс прибежит скупать подешевевшие итальянские активы, параллельно закрывая всё что может составить конкуренцию американским компаниям, вот тогда сравним экономики. И посмотрим, а не окажется ли Италия не в "международном сообществе", а на одной стороне с Россией?:))
  A new reply to this comment has been posted.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Val Samonis Dec 29, 2016

RIP.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.

http://prosyn.org/gHFewb2/es;

La Unión Soviética murió para siempre

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Featured

MAD About Sino-American Trade

Good Politics, Bad Economics

Japan’s Successful Economic Model

The Immorality of Boris Johnson and Donald Trump

Fresh Momentum for the Balkans

New Comment

Email this piece to a friend

Contact us

Fresh Momentum for the Balkans

The Left Will Decide Poland’s Future

Japan’s Successful Economic Model

Good Politics, Bad Economics

Trump’s Currency Confusion Continues

MAD About Sino-American Trade

Emerging Markets’ Shifting Bottom Line

Hurricanes at the Ballot Box

Cookies and Privacy

Log in/Register