President Bush's comparison of the capture of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed (reputed to have planned the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon) to the liberation of Paris in 1944 was certainly hyperbolic, but the arrest was a political blessing for the US President all the same. For Pakistan's General Pervez Musharaf, Mohammed's apprehension is a mixed bag: it gained a pat on the back from Mr. Bush but simultaneously revealed the falsity of General Musharaf's claims that Pakistan is largely Al-Qaida free. Indeed, it is now starkly apparent that much of Al-Qaida and its top leadership prefer refuge in Pakistan to any other place.
The reason would be obvious to anyone who witnessed the recent "million man march" in Karachi organized by Pakistan's newly formed coalition of religious parties, known as the MMA. Called to protest America's impending attack on Iraq, marchers set effigies of George Bush and Tony Blair on fire as smiling portraits of Osama bin Laden, draped with fresh flowers, looked on. Speaker after speaker accused General Musharaf's government of treachery and denounced its cooperation with the FBI in nabbing Al-Qaida members.
Before the terrorist attacks on America and the ouster of the Taliban in next-door Afghanistan, Pakistan's religious parties had few seats in either the federal or provincial assemblies. Resentment against the US after the bombing of Afghanistan rocketed the religious alliance's popularity sky-high. The religious alliance has now formed governments in two of Pakistan's four provinces, the Frontier and Baluchistan, and openly declares its intent to shatter Pakistan's pro-American policy.
The rise of the MMA is sure to make a fundamental change upon not only Pakistani foreign policy but also upon the country's society and culture. Almost immediately after assuming office, the new governments ordered an end to music in public transport, required public buses to stand still for the five daily prayers, and closed down video shops and cinema houses. Folk singers have been threatened, abducted, and forbidden to sing in public. Cable television operators see their premises ransacked.
More of this awaits. New laws, expected to be passed by the Frontier Assembly soon, follow the lead of Afghanistan's former Taliban government. For example, women without "hijab" and a chaperone may not leave their homes; shops shall not advertise the sale of sanitary pads or undergarments; hair-removing creams and lotions may not be sold; use of perfume and makeup will be banned; women will not be allowed to use male tailors; male doctors may not treat women patients; women guests at hotels will not be allowed in the swimming pool; coeducation has been identified as a cause of fornication and is to be phased out; family planning shall be declared un-Islamic, and the sale of contraceptives banned.
Driven by its compulsion to make war on Iraq at all costs, Washington has shown little inclination to consider the war's long-term impact on countries lying at the periphery of the war zone. In a special trip to Islamabad, US Assistant Secretary of State Christina Rocca sought to reassure a visibly nervous Pakistani government that the war would be "quick and short."
Access every new PS commentary, our entire On Point suite of subscriber-exclusive content – including Longer Reads, Insider Interviews, Big Picture/Big Question, and Say More – and the full PS archive.
Subscribe Now
Even if Rocca is right, the anger flowing in Pakistan's streets will drastically weaken moderate opinion while further radicalizing Islamic groups. However, if the war drags on, if Baghdad comes under siege with heavy civilian casualties - or if weapons of mass destruction are actually used - all bets could be off. Mounting anger within the Pakistan Army, whose soldiers exchanged fire with American troops two months ago, would make Musharaf's isolation total, perhaps forcing him to abandon the American-led coalition.
To appease radical opinion, Islamic militant leaders who were jailed a year ago are now operating freely again. A taped speech by the released head of the Lashkar-i-Tayyaba, Hafiz Saeed, was played on Kashmir Day at mosques in Rawalpindi. Lashing out at India and America, the firebrand cleric rhetorically asked, "Allah has told us to make atom bombs. America is telling us not to. O Muslims, to whom shall we listen, Allah or America?"
Meanwhile, across the border in Afghanistan, US forces are experiencing frequent ambushes and rocket attacks upon their bases. This has led to aggressive US Army sweeps, backed in some cases by heavy bombers.
The heightened activity, much of it concentrated along the Pakistani border, suggests that some of Pakistan's army intelligence officers have resumed their support of the Taliban and its friends. Waiting for spring to come is ex-mujahideen commander Gulbuddin Hekmatyar - a former favorite of the CIA and Pakistan's ISI during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. He is massing his forces and weapons for a determined strike against American forces. Hekmatyar and Al-Qaida expect their task to be easier since the enemy is likely to have its attention focused on Iraq.
Fighting terror backed by radical Islam requires a sophisticated understanding of its political and economic roots. America's plan to liberate Iraq with cruise missiles betrays not only crude ignorance, but also a lack of will to try and deal with the causes of terrorism. America's strategic myopia may well provide bin Laden and his kind with a fresh flood of recruits and make Pakistan, the Islamic world's only nuclear-armed state, ungovernable.
To have unlimited access to our content including in-depth commentaries, book reviews, exclusive interviews, PS OnPoint and PS The Big Picture, please subscribe
Tech companies know that if there is an open, democratic debate about data security, consumers’ concerns about digital safeguards will win out. And while the industry's lobbyists tried to ensure that no such debate could ever occur, one of their more cynical moves has now been exposed and thwarted.
details how the industry tried to slip extraordinary protections against regulation into US trade agreements.
If we measure a failed state by the cracks in the edifice of its power, reflected in brewing ideological civil wars, deadlocked assemblies, and increasingly insecure public spaces, we must recognize that the United States is not so unlike Haiti. Both have given rise to violent gangs with political ambitions.
warns that rich Western democracies are not immune to politically motivated gang violence.
President Bush's comparison of the capture of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed (reputed to have planned the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon) to the liberation of Paris in 1944 was certainly hyperbolic, but the arrest was a political blessing for the US President all the same. For Pakistan's General Pervez Musharaf, Mohammed's apprehension is a mixed bag: it gained a pat on the back from Mr. Bush but simultaneously revealed the falsity of General Musharaf's claims that Pakistan is largely Al-Qaida free. Indeed, it is now starkly apparent that much of Al-Qaida and its top leadership prefer refuge in Pakistan to any other place.
The reason would be obvious to anyone who witnessed the recent "million man march" in Karachi organized by Pakistan's newly formed coalition of religious parties, known as the MMA. Called to protest America's impending attack on Iraq, marchers set effigies of George Bush and Tony Blair on fire as smiling portraits of Osama bin Laden, draped with fresh flowers, looked on. Speaker after speaker accused General Musharaf's government of treachery and denounced its cooperation with the FBI in nabbing Al-Qaida members.
Before the terrorist attacks on America and the ouster of the Taliban in next-door Afghanistan, Pakistan's religious parties had few seats in either the federal or provincial assemblies. Resentment against the US after the bombing of Afghanistan rocketed the religious alliance's popularity sky-high. The religious alliance has now formed governments in two of Pakistan's four provinces, the Frontier and Baluchistan, and openly declares its intent to shatter Pakistan's pro-American policy.
The rise of the MMA is sure to make a fundamental change upon not only Pakistani foreign policy but also upon the country's society and culture. Almost immediately after assuming office, the new governments ordered an end to music in public transport, required public buses to stand still for the five daily prayers, and closed down video shops and cinema houses. Folk singers have been threatened, abducted, and forbidden to sing in public. Cable television operators see their premises ransacked.
More of this awaits. New laws, expected to be passed by the Frontier Assembly soon, follow the lead of Afghanistan's former Taliban government. For example, women without "hijab" and a chaperone may not leave their homes; shops shall not advertise the sale of sanitary pads or undergarments; hair-removing creams and lotions may not be sold; use of perfume and makeup will be banned; women will not be allowed to use male tailors; male doctors may not treat women patients; women guests at hotels will not be allowed in the swimming pool; coeducation has been identified as a cause of fornication and is to be phased out; family planning shall be declared un-Islamic, and the sale of contraceptives banned.
Driven by its compulsion to make war on Iraq at all costs, Washington has shown little inclination to consider the war's long-term impact on countries lying at the periphery of the war zone. In a special trip to Islamabad, US Assistant Secretary of State Christina Rocca sought to reassure a visibly nervous Pakistani government that the war would be "quick and short."
Subscribe to PS Digital
Access every new PS commentary, our entire On Point suite of subscriber-exclusive content – including Longer Reads, Insider Interviews, Big Picture/Big Question, and Say More – and the full PS archive.
Subscribe Now
Even if Rocca is right, the anger flowing in Pakistan's streets will drastically weaken moderate opinion while further radicalizing Islamic groups. However, if the war drags on, if Baghdad comes under siege with heavy civilian casualties - or if weapons of mass destruction are actually used - all bets could be off. Mounting anger within the Pakistan Army, whose soldiers exchanged fire with American troops two months ago, would make Musharaf's isolation total, perhaps forcing him to abandon the American-led coalition.
To appease radical opinion, Islamic militant leaders who were jailed a year ago are now operating freely again. A taped speech by the released head of the Lashkar-i-Tayyaba, Hafiz Saeed, was played on Kashmir Day at mosques in Rawalpindi. Lashing out at India and America, the firebrand cleric rhetorically asked, "Allah has told us to make atom bombs. America is telling us not to. O Muslims, to whom shall we listen, Allah or America?"
Meanwhile, across the border in Afghanistan, US forces are experiencing frequent ambushes and rocket attacks upon their bases. This has led to aggressive US Army sweeps, backed in some cases by heavy bombers.
The heightened activity, much of it concentrated along the Pakistani border, suggests that some of Pakistan's army intelligence officers have resumed their support of the Taliban and its friends. Waiting for spring to come is ex-mujahideen commander Gulbuddin Hekmatyar - a former favorite of the CIA and Pakistan's ISI during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. He is massing his forces and weapons for a determined strike against American forces. Hekmatyar and Al-Qaida expect their task to be easier since the enemy is likely to have its attention focused on Iraq.
Fighting terror backed by radical Islam requires a sophisticated understanding of its political and economic roots. America's plan to liberate Iraq with cruise missiles betrays not only crude ignorance, but also a lack of will to try and deal with the causes of terrorism. America's strategic myopia may well provide bin Laden and his kind with a fresh flood of recruits and make Pakistan, the Islamic world's only nuclear-armed state, ungovernable.