¿Negociaciones serias o confrontación ardiente con Irán?

Berlín – Durante dos semanas, parecía que el régimen iraní finalmente había recibido el mensaje de que, si sigue adelante con su programa nuclear, el resultado probable es una confrontación militar grave. De hecho, hubo declaraciones y señales interesantes –y nunca oídas previamente- desde Teherán que sugerían una mayor voluntad de iniciar negociaciones sobre el programa nuclear de Irán y asuntos de seguridad regional. Y la decisión de Estados Unidos de enviar al subsecretario de Estado William Burns a una reunión con el principal negociador nuclear de Irán sugiere que esas señales están siendo tomadas en serio.

Pero en la reciente muestra de poderío militar con pruebas de cohetes y el rechazo de un acuerdo por parte del presidente iraní, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, y su ministro de Relaciones Exteriores demuestran que el liderazgo del país está seriamente dividido respecto de la línea estratégica que debería perseguir Irán.

Los líderes de Irán todavía albergan el concepto equivocado de que las amenazas israelíes contra sus instalaciones nucleares son una expresión de las dificultades internas del gobierno del primer ministro Ehud Olmert. Esto es lisa y llanamente un error. El gobierno de Olmert tiene serios problemas, pero no son la causa de que la situación entre Israel e Irán esté llegando a un punto límite.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/Q6kT9ED/es;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now