Rumores de guerra

Es una creencia muy extendida el que la guerra está relacionada con tiempos de bonanza económica. A menudo se dice que la Segunda Guerra Mundial sacó al mundo de la Gran Depresión y desde entonces la guerra ha acrecentado su reputación como estímulo para el crecimiento económico. Algunos incluso sugieren que el capitalismo necesita guerras y que, sin ellas, la recesión siempre se asomaría por el horizonte.

Hoy sabemos que esas afirmaciones no tienen sentido alguno. El boom de la década de 1990 mostró que la paz es económicamente más conveniente que la guerra. La Guerra del Golfo de 1991 demostró que las guerras en realidad pueden ser perjudiciales para una economía. Ese conflicto contribuyó poderosamente al surgimiento de la recesión de 1991 (la que, es necesario recordar, fue probablemente el factor clave que impidió al Presidente Bush ser reelecto en 1992).

La situación actual es, con mucho, más similar a la Guerra del Golfo que a las guerras que pueden haber contribuido al crecimiento económico. De hecho, los efectos económicos de una segunda guerra contra Irak probablemente serían más adversos. La Segunda Guerra Mundial exigió una movilización total, y fue esa movilización total, que requirió los recursos completos de un país, lo que barrió con el desempleo. Guerra total significa empleo total.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now