Safia Osman/Flickr

El camino hacia la inversión plena

LONDRES Un fantasma acecha las tesorerías y bancos centrales de Occidente – es el fantasma del estancamiento secular. ¿Qué pasaría si no se llegase a lograr una recuperación sostenible de la caída económica de los años 2008 al 2013? ¿Qué pasaría si las fuentes de crecimiento económico se hubiesen secado – no temporalmente, sino de forma permanente?

El nuevo pesimismo no surge de los marxistas, quienes siempre han estado en la búsqueda de señales del próximo colapso del capitalismo, sino que proviene del corazón de la élite de los formuladores de políticas: la fuente es Larry Summers, Secretario del Tesoro del ex presidente de EE.UU. Bill Clinton y, en uno u otro momento, economista en jefe de muchas  instituciones económicas.

El razonamiento de Summers, en pocas palabras, es que si la rentabilidad esperada sobre la inversión está en caída, las tasas de interés tienen que caer en la misma medida. Sin embargo, las tasas de interés no pueden caer por debajo de cero (de hecho, pudiesen verse atrapadas por encima de cero si existe una fuerte inclinación a acumular saldos en dinero en efectivo). Esto podría dar lugar a que las expectativas de ganancias caigan por debajo del costo de los préstamos.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/aySzfFv/es;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now