Op weg naar een nieuw beleid van armoedebestrijding

ROME – De wereldleiders hebben hoog opgegeven van het schijnbare succes dat al in 2010 – d.w.z. ruim vóór de deadline van 2015 – het Millennium Ontwikkelingsdoel is bereikt om het deel van de mensheid dat onder de armoedegrens leeft te halveren. Maar temidden van de aanhoudende armoede, stijgende ongelijkheid en tegenvallende groei in veel ontwikkelingslanden lijkt het succes van het anti-armoedebeleid twijfelachtig.

In feite is de vooruitgang buiten Azië bescheiden geweest, waarbij de situatie in een aantal landen en regio's is verslechterd – ondanks diverse groeispurts, de aanhoudende economische groei in een paar grote ontwikkelingslanden en de toewijding van de internationale gemeenschap aan de 2000 Millennium Declaration, die tot de formulering van de Millennium Ontwikkelingsdoelen heeft geleid.

Dit gemengde beeld roept twijfels op over de effectiviteit van het conventionele armoedebestrijdingsbeleid, dat dikwijls in verband wordt gebracht met de zogenoemde 'Washington Consensus,' waardoor het discours over de armoede in de jaren tachtig is bepaald. De door de Washington Consensus geïnspireerde hervormingen – zoals macro-economische stabilisatie (gedefinieerd als een inflatiepercentage onder de tien procent) en marktliberalisering – moesten de armoede terugdingen door de economische groei te versnellen.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now