La farce du référendum birman

PRAGUE – L’immense souffrance du peuple birman, provoquée par le récent cyclone qui a causé des dizaines de milliers de morts, mérite la sympathie du monde entier. Mais il faut à ce peuple davantage que de la sympathie, car l’incompétence de la junte militaire birmane et l’oppression brutale qu’elle lui inflige ne font qu’aggraver les conséquences tragiques de cette catastrophe naturelle.

Au beau milieu de la dévastation du cyclone, les généraux dirigeant le Myanmar ont maintenu leur référendum sur la nouvelle constitution. Conformément à la loi birmane sur le référendum constitutionnel, les membres d’organisations religieuses, les personnes qui font l’objet de poursuites judiciaires et les membres de groupes ethniques qui n’ont pas accepté le cessez-le-feu avec le gouvernement n’ont pas eu le droit de voter. Par conséquent, tous les prisonniers politiques actuels et passés, environ 500 000 moines bouddhistes et plus de deux fois plus de membres appartenant aux minorités ethniques vivant près des frontières se sont vus interdire de scrutin.

En outre, conformément à la nouvelle constitution censément “approuvée” par le “référendum,” Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, qui n’a jamais été poursuivie mais reste assignée à résidence, n’a pas le droit de se présenter aux élections de 2010 sous prétexte qu’elle est la veuve d’un Britannique. Le monde veut-il vraiment accepter une telle absurdité ?

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/uhMpvZq/fr;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now