Ted Cruz Branden Camp via ZUMA Wire

Reformar ou Deformar o Fed?

BERKELEY – A silly season que constitui uma campanha eleitoral presidencial nos Estados Unidos deu uma guinada especialmente absurda, agora que os candidatos apresentam as suas propostas para a reforma da política monetária. Esta não é a primeira vez, claro está, em que os candidatos presidenciais propuseram alterar o modo de condução da política monetária dos EUA. Mas a natureza radical, e por vezes desmiolada, da safra actual de esquemas é excepcional em termos históricos.

A razão por que estas propostas atraem os candidatos e os votantes potenciais não tem qualquer mistério. Desde a crise financeira, a Reserva Federal dos EUA tomou uma série de medidas sem precedentes, cortando as taxas de juro até zero, expandindo enormemente o seu balanço, e resgatando instituições financeiras em dificuldades. Estas medidas pretendiam tratar os males da economia, mas a sua própria associação a esses males encoraja a crença de que são de alguma forma a sua causa subjacente.

Do mesmo modo, a participação do Fed em resgates de instituições financeiras em dificuldades é criticada por favorecer Wall Street relativamente a outros sectores (N.T.: no original, favoring Wall Street over Main Street). E, para além disso, o Fed é criticado por criar desigualdades, primeiro por manter reduzidas as taxas de juro, que penalizam quem tem rendimentos fixos, e agora por aumentar as taxas, o que coloca limites ao crescimento dos salários.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now