Una política de la competencia depredadora

La reciente decisión del Tribunal Europeo de Primera Estancia de revalidar la multa y las sanciones que la Comisión Europea impuso a Microsoft en 2004 parece haber justificado el criterio intervencionista de la Comisión en materia de política de la competencia. Una investigación de Intel, que se ha prolongado durante cinco años, podría acabar también con la aplicación de sanciones severas, pero la UE no debería alegrarse de ese aparente triunfo sobre las "grandes empresas" americanas. Más bien debería meditar sobre si sus políticas hacen de verdad de Europa una zona acogedora para las empresas innovadoras.

La ministra italiana de Comercio y Asuntos Europeos, Emma Bonino, al comentar el fallo sobre Microsoft, observó que el propio nombre de Microsoft evoca "lo que los EE.UU. son capaces de hacer". Para Bonino, si en Europa no ha nacido una empresa de importancia comparable, es porque "no hemos sido capaces de crear una atmósfera favorable para que florezca".

El planteamiento de la política de la competencia por parte de la Comisión Europea no hará avanzar a Europa hacia esa atmósfera mejor. De hecho, empresas de tecnología avanzada como Microsoft o Intel son blancos particularmente inapropiados para la política antimonopolista, porque los reguladores no pueden avanzar a la velocidad de la "época de Internet".

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now