Sin socio en el Pakistán

Nueva York – El Presidente George W. Bush consideró con razón las recientes elecciones nacionales y provinciales del Pakistán “una victoria para [su] pueblo”, pero, en el preciso momento en que pronunciaba esas palabras, su gobierno estaba actuando entre bastidores para subvertir la voluntad del pueblo del Pakistán al intentar dictar la composición de su próxima coalición de gobierno y apoyar al mayor perdedor de las elecciones, el Presidente Pervez Musharraf. Bush se está entregando a un juego peligroso, que entraña el riesgo de deteriorar el proceso político del Pakistán, en pro de su legado histórico.

Millones de pakistaníes lanzaron un mensaje claro en las urnas. Votaron colectivamente contra Musharraf y los extremistas religiosos y a favor de la democracia, el Estado de derecho y la gestión idónea de los asuntos públicos.

Ningún partido recibió una mayoría a escala de la nación, pero la oposición democrática y centrista obtuvo más del 70 por ciento de los escaños de la Asamblea Nacional. La facción del Partido Liga Musulmana (PML-Q) aliada con Musharraf ocupó el tercer puesto con sólo el 15 por ciento, pese a contar con la ayuda del fraude electoral. La mayoría de sus dirigentes principales fueron derrotados en sus circunscripciones… incluido uno que llevaba 26 años sin perder una elección. El PML-Q, creado en 1999 por los servicios de inteligencia del Pakistán, es una mercancía política inservible.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/i3ZAmuQ/es;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now