Forest and industrial field with pollution overhead

Dalle buone intenzioni alla profonda decarbonizzazione

NEW YORK – Sulla scia della Conferenza sui cambiamenti climatici delle Nazioni Unite (COP21) tenutasi a Parigi, oltre 150 governi hanno presentato dei piani per ridurre le emissioni di carbonio entro il 2030. Molti osservatori si chiedono se tali riduzioni sia abbastanza profonde. Ma c’è un’altra domanda ancor più importante: il percorso scelto fino al 2030 riuscirà a porre le basi per mettere fine alle emissioni di gas serra entro la fine del secolo?

In base al consenso scientifico, la stabilizzazione del clima richiede la piena decarbonizzazione dei nostri sistemi energetici ed emissioni zero dei gas serra entro il 2070. Il G-7 ha riconosciuto che la decarbonizzazione – l’unico porto sicuro per i disastrosi cambiamenti climatici – è l’obiettivo finale di questo secolo. E molti capi di stato provenienti dal G-20 e da altri paesi hanno pubblicamente dichiarato le proprie intenzioni di intraprendere questa strada.

Eppure i paesi riunitisi alla COP21 non stanno ancora negoziando il processo di decarbonizzazione. Stanno facendo dei passi piuttosto modesti, verso il 2025 o il 2030, chiamati Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC, “contributi volontari definiti a livello nazionale”). Gli INDC degli Stati Uniti, ad esempio, prevedono che il paese riduca del 26-28% le emissioni di CO2 entro il 2025 rispetto ai valori del 2005.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in;

Handpicked to read next

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now