La política de equilibrio nuclear de Obama

WASHINGTON, DC – Tal vez nunca en la historia la seguridad nuclear, la no proliferación nuclear y el control de las armas nucleares hayan recibido la importancia que recibirán durante el triplete estratégico que tendrá lugar este mes: el lanzamiento el 6 de abril de la última Revisión de la Postura Nuclear de Estados Unidos (RPN, por su sigla en inglés), la firma el 8 de abril en Praga del nuevo tratado START y la Cumbre de Seguridad Nuclear el 12 y 13 de abril. Estos eventos serán discutidos en la Conferencia de Revisión del Tratado de No Proliferación (TNP), en el mes de mayo.

El presidente norteamericano, Barack Obama, se ha convertido en uno de los defensores globales más prominentes de la abolición de las armas nucleares, una postura por la que, inesperadamente, recibió un Premio Nobel de la Paz el año pasado. Pero las acciones de Obama han sido considerablemente más restringidas de lo que generalmente se piensa.

En general, Obama persiguió una política de equilibrio nuclear en la que las medidas hacia el desarme están acompañadas de medidas destinadas a conservar la primacía nuclear de Estados Unidos. Las primeras subrayan el compromiso de su gobierno con el cumplimiento de sus obligaciones según el TNP, mientras que las segundas tranquilizan al Congreso estadounidense y a los aliados escépticos de los nuevos enfoques audaces.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/SwWGey1/es;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now